summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002733.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002733.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002733.html111
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002733.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002733.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..daa1e290c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002733.html
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20About%20panotools%20patent%20problem%20%28and%20other%0A%20problematic%20rpms%29&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTim%2Bc6T6zG1xU2fegp%3D_b8SM2ze7CmJDGp318_Jy%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002732.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002735.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)</H1>
+ <B>Romain d'Alverny</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20About%20panotools%20patent%20problem%20%28and%20other%0A%20problematic%20rpms%29&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTim%2Bc6T6zG1xU2fegp%3D_b8SM2ze7CmJDGp318_Jy%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)">rdalverny at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Feb 22 11:04:26 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002732.html">[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002735.html">[Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2733">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2733">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2733">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2733">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:57, Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> Le vendredi 18 f&#233;vrier 2011 &#224; 10:13 +0100, Philippe DIDIER a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Just seen that mikala added panotools in the repository . (some
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> algorythms library to build panoramic photographs)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Very happy with this ! (thanks a lot...)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> That's one of the first patent problems we may encounter :
+</I>
+Yes, that's a good sample to use to improve our policy draft.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> Long time ago,
+</I>
+How long is a &quot;long time ago&quot;? because every patent has a term and
+here it may have expired.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> iPIX, a company from USA muliplied patent lawsuit against
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> these free algorythms inventor and photographers using them (this
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> company is now dead because of bankruptcy but the patent problem is
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> still live... )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Well, who own the patents now ?
+</I>
+&gt;<i>From <A HREF="http://wiki.panotools.org/Ipix">http://wiki.panotools.org/Ipix</A> it looks a former competitor got a
+</I>hold on all assets from iPix.
+
+On the decision/sorting out side, for this and for any other patent
+issue, do we document already (in source code or a separate file) the
+reasons to activate or not pieces of a software (or to exclude them
+from packages), because of some patents?
+
+List of questions to check would be at least:
+ - what is exactly covered by what patent (reference, registration,
+territory/ies for which it has been registered)?
+ - where is it implemented exactly in the source code? (
+ - who owns this patent?
+ - did the patent holder announce his clear intention upon it? (that
+is, is he using it to control/restrain use or not? *)
+ - are there obvious prior art that could make this patent obviously invalid?
+ - what is decided and when (and what may change the decision, later)?
+ - what would be alternative ways to implement the function (if the
+patent does not just cover the function, but a specific implementation
+of it)?
+
+* one does not necessarily register a patent to be offensive with it;
+here, we knew about iPix, what about the new holder?
+
+Btw, a draft policy for patents management was discussed among
+founders and other people (lawyers) months ago and a tentative summary
+written by me here:
+<A HREF="http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=software_patents_policy">http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=software_patents_policy</A> .
+
+Cheers,
+
+Romain
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002732.html">[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002735.html">[Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2733">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2733">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2733">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2733">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>