summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110123/002313.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110123/002313.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110123/002313.html114
1 files changed, 114 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110123/002313.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110123/002313.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bc3152c06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110123/002313.html
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Compatibility%3A%20%25mdkversion%20macro%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1295737990.4234.8.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002314.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Compatibility%3A%20%25mdkversion%20macro%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1295737990.4234.8.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Jan 23 00:13:10 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002314.html">[Mageia-dev] [Announce] Rejection of submission with missing dependencies
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2313">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2313">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2313">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2313">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 &#224; 15:45 +0200, Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On 17.01.2011 10:38, Michael scherer wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:19:29AM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Hi all!
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; 201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; &quot;%if %mdkversion &lt; x&quot; to fail to build.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; I'm strongly in favor of having it for compatibility reasons, so that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; most MDV src.rpms keep building on Mageia for the time being, including
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; those provided by any 3rd party packagers.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Not having the macro will cause us to lose that compatibility for very
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; little benefit, IMO. It could maybe be removed after several releases,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; but not before.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; However, it seems blino disagreed with this, and he thinks we should not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; have these macros at all.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; What do other people think?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; If not having those macros means we can't compile mdv SRPMS on mageia, then
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I'd prefer we keep it.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; then keep them forever ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Because for one, mdkversion should have disappeared when the suffix was changed,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; something like 5 years ago. And the fact we still rely on it is not a good sign.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; More ever, even on Mandriva, most of them do not make much sense. Most of the software
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; are not backported ( as the usage of the macros is mainly for stuff replaced
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; by filetrigger ), and they are never cleaned.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On the file trigger side, we have most of the macros going back to 2009.0, where we
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; can't backport anything on the BS. And 2010.0 for the trigger for web application, and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I do not think we backport them usually ( as people barely see the value of packaging
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; them... ).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; So I think we will not have much problem, except this force us to do more cleaning.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Cleaning that obviously didn't happened before, as we are needing to do it now.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; So drop it, have more generic macros, and smarter policy.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The problem is not backports IMO, it is building 3rdparty src.rpm or old
+</I>&gt;<i> src.rpm on Mageia (i.e. forward-porting), which won't work if we do not
+</I>&gt;<i> have %mdkversion.
+</I>
+We could have the macro in a specific rpm. This way, it would be easier
+to find when we need them ( ie searching on BuildRequires ) so we can
+expect what is needed, and we could more easily rebuild and update if we
+need to change the macros ( like, if they change on mandriva level ).
+
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002314.html">[Mageia-dev] [Announce] Rejection of submission with missing dependencies
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2313">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2313">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2313">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2313">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>