summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110121/002288.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110121/002288.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110121/002288.html118
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110121/002288.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110121/002288.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5321b014b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110121/002288.html
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Compatibility%3A%20%25mdkversion%20macro%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4D398E01.10008%40iki.fi%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002290.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002292.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?</H1>
+ <B>Anssi Hannula</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Compatibility%3A%20%25mdkversion%20macro%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4D398E01.10008%40iki.fi%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?">anssi.hannula at iki.fi
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Jan 21 14:45:37 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002290.html">[Mageia-dev] undefined reference to `pow' even with -lm
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002292.html">[Mageia-dev] Character encoding issue in Mageia identity manager?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2288">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2288">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2288">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2288">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 17.01.2011 10:38, Michael scherer wrote:
+&gt;<i> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:19:29AM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Hi all!
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> 201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;%if %mdkversion &lt; x&quot; to fail to build.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I'm strongly in favor of having it for compatibility reasons, so that
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> most MDV src.rpms keep building on Mageia for the time being, including
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> those provided by any 3rd party packagers.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Not having the macro will cause us to lose that compatibility for very
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> little benefit, IMO. It could maybe be removed after several releases,
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> but not before.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> However, it seems blino disagreed with this, and he thinks we should not
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> have these macros at all.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> What do other people think?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> If not having those macros means we can't compile mdv SRPMS on mageia, then
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I'd prefer we keep it.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> then keep them forever ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Because for one, mdkversion should have disappeared when the suffix was changed,
+</I>&gt;<i> something like 5 years ago. And the fact we still rely on it is not a good sign.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> More ever, even on Mandriva, most of them do not make much sense. Most of the software
+</I>&gt;<i> are not backported ( as the usage of the macros is mainly for stuff replaced
+</I>&gt;<i> by filetrigger ), and they are never cleaned.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On the file trigger side, we have most of the macros going back to 2009.0, where we
+</I>&gt;<i> can't backport anything on the BS. And 2010.0 for the trigger for web application, and
+</I>&gt;<i> I do not think we backport them usually ( as people barely see the value of packaging
+</I>&gt;<i> them... ).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So I think we will not have much problem, except this force us to do more cleaning.
+</I>&gt;<i> Cleaning that obviously didn't happened before, as we are needing to do it now.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So drop it, have more generic macros, and smarter policy.
+</I>
+The problem is not backports IMO, it is building 3rdparty src.rpm or old
+src.rpm on Mageia (i.e. forward-porting), which won't work if we do not
+have %mdkversion.
+
+--
+Anssi Hannula
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002290.html">[Mageia-dev] undefined reference to `pow' even with -lm
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002292.html">[Mageia-dev] Character encoding issue in Mageia identity manager?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2288">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2288">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2288">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2288">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>