diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110106/001987.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110106/001987.html | 73 |
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110106/001987.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110106/001987.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a006d9ab2 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110106/001987.html @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Adding%20Java-Policy&In-Reply-To=%3C4D263528.1080604%40roadrunner.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001985.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001973.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy</H1> + <B>Frank Griffin</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Adding%20Java-Policy&In-Reply-To=%3C4D263528.1080604%40roadrunner.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy">ftg at roadrunner.com + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Jan 6 22:33:28 CET 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001985.html">[Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001973.html">[Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1987">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1987">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1987">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1987">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Michael Scherer wrote: +><i> Why include gcj in fact ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>I wondered about this when I took a look at some Java packages (e.g. +maven) to see how easy they would be to upgrade. A huge amount of +complexity was introduced by the desire of the existing RPMs to produce +a gcj version of the tool involved. + +I can certainly see the appeal of gcj as "compiled java" for some target +audiences even if most of us developers can't afford not to be +developing and testing with more mainstream JDKs, but it's not clear to +me that gcj needs to be a part of the install for every Java-based tool. + +I'm not that familiar with gcj, but I wonder if there couldn't be +separate packages which recompile individual tools under it where +appropriate in some automated fashion rather than forcing every Java +tool packager to do this. +</PRE> + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001985.html">[Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001973.html">[Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1987">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1987">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1987">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1987">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |