diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008507.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008507.html | 107 |
1 files changed, 107 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008507.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008507.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d2dc9d9e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008507.html @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Opening%20backports%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Using%0A%09SQL%20database%20for%20youri%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201109292110.42266.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008506.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008555.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)</H1> + <B>Samuel Verschelde</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Opening%20backports%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Using%0A%09SQL%20database%20for%20youri%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201109292110.42266.stormi%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)">stormi at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Sep 29 21:10:42 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008506.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008555.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8507">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8507">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8507">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8507">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 20:55:43, Florian Hubold a écrit : +><i> Am 29.09.2011 14:13, schrieb Olav Vitters: +</I>><i> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:24:56AM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: +</I>><i> >> backports_testing, but it means that we would lose the current checking +</I>><i> >> that updates come from the 1/updates branch) +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Long term I prefer more checks because I do make mistakes. But maybe lax +</I>><i> > as a temporary ("a few weeks") solution until it uses the SQL database? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Well, is it really that necessary for a matter of some weeks to speed up +</I>><i> backports opening? Shouldn't we care first that sustainability of Mageia +</I>><i> is ensured first? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> It's not like backports candidates will lessen workload on QA, rather the +</I>><i> opposite. That's my personal opinion. +</I> +Some genuine user needs can only be covered by backports per our policy, I +don't see why we should wait more (already 4 months since the release of +Mageia 1). QA team already said it's ready to test backports, and if we have +difficulty we simply will find means to get more testers. Also, updates will +still remain the priority. + +Opening backports media does not mean that we will start backporting +everything. But a policy has been chosen, after a loooooooooong debate, and +there seems to be a simple way to open those media to package submitting. + +Also, the sooner we have backports, the less there will be external third- +party repos with all the problems (upgrade, support) that causes. There +already are, don't let them too much space and rather invite their packagers +to backport *inside* (as long as they stay within the policy of course). + +About Mageia's sustainability, we already are working to that (QA team is +operational, package adoption campaign is undergoing...), and having backports +media won't prevent us from continuing. + +Also, the "few weeks" is a really vague estimation, my guess is it risks to be +rather months because sysadmins seem to have a big TODO list a little +resources. That's why I'm proposing 2 "technically simple" ways to move +forward. + +Best regards + +Samuel Verschelde +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008506.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008555.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8507">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8507">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8507">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8507">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |