diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008308.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008308.html | 205 |
1 files changed, 205 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008308.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008308.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..76d4d4eef --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008308.html @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Trying to solve bug #2317 (was: Re: Meeting tonight) + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Trying%20to%20solve%20bug%20%232317%20%28was%3A%20Re%3A%20Meeting%20tonight%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201109221435.55143.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008288.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008309.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Trying to solve bug #2317 (was: Re: Meeting tonight)</H1> + <B>Samuel Verschelde</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Trying%20to%20solve%20bug%20%232317%20%28was%3A%20Re%3A%20Meeting%20tonight%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201109221435.55143.stormi%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Trying to solve bug #2317 (was: Re: Meeting tonight)">stormi at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Sep 22 14:35:55 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008288.html">[Mageia-dev] Meeting tonight +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008309.html">[Mageia-dev] Trying to solve bug #2317 (was: Re: Meeting tonight) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8308">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8308">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8308">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8308">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le jeudi 15 septembre 2011 16:12:11, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : +[...] +><i> Suggestions: +</I>><i> - investigating using the equivalent of --searchmedia +</I> +That is an interesting option indeed. + +><i> - reusing the old connectiva upgrade infrastructure in the drakx installer +</I>><i> and release a patched installed (a mageia 1.1) that list mdv packages, +</I>><i> remove them prior to upgrading" +</I> +This looks like a heavy solution (needs new ISOs, doesn't cover already +migrated systems, means that mdv packages that have no equivalent in mageia +are removed from the system), so it's not my preferred solution. + +><i> - patch perl-URPM so that foobar-X-Ymga is always newer than foobar-Z-Wmdv +</I> +I'm sorry, but I don't understand what problems this third option would solve. +Can you explain to me (and maybe I'm not alone) ? + +><i> +</I>><i> In the first case, we would go with something like r[1-4].diff +</I>><i> warning: unknown impact on startup time & RAM usage (in fact it's not +</I>><i> even tested) +</I> +I applied those 4 patches to rpmdrake and built a RPM that I installed on my +system, but I haven't seen a difference in behaviour. The msec update candidate +from updates_testing (updates_testing media have the update flag set on my +system) still can't be installed, with the following message: + +Sorry, the following package cannot be selected: +- msec-0.80.10-2.2.mga1.i586 (due to unsatisfied sendmail) + +It apparently still doesn't use the /release media in MageiaUpdate, if I infer +correctly from the console logs : + +[<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">root at localhost</A> ~]# LC_ALL=C MageiaUpdate +getting lock on urpmi +using mirror <A HREF="ftp://distrib-">ftp://distrib-</A> +coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/Mageia/distrib/1/i586 +retrieved $MIRRORLIST media/core/updates media_info/MD5SUM +comparing /var/cache/urpmi/partial/MD5SUM and /var/lib/urpmi/Core +Updates/MD5SUM +medium "Core Updates" is up-to-date +retrieved $MIRRORLIST media/core/updates_testing media_info/MD5SUM +comparing /var/cache/urpmi/partial/MD5SUM and /var/lib/urpmi/Core Updates +Testing/MD5SUM +medium "Core Updates Testing" is up-to-date +retrieved $MIRRORLIST media/nonfree/updates media_info/MD5SUM +comparing /var/cache/urpmi/partial/MD5SUM and /var/lib/urpmi/Nonfree +Updates/MD5SUM +medium "Nonfree Updates" is up-to-date +retrieved $MIRRORLIST media/nonfree/updates_testing media_info/MD5SUM +comparing /var/cache/urpmi/partial/MD5SUM and /var/lib/urpmi/Nonfree Updates +Testing/MD5SUM +medium "Nonfree Updates Testing" is up-to-date +retrieved $MIRRORLIST media/tainted/updates media_info/MD5SUM +comparing /var/cache/urpmi/partial/MD5SUM and /var/lib/urpmi/Tainted +Updates/MD5SUM +medium "Tainted Updates" is up-to-date +retrieved $MIRRORLIST media/tainted/updates_testing media_info/MD5SUM +comparing /var/cache/urpmi/partial/MD5SUM and /var/lib/urpmi/Tainted Updates +Testing/MD5SUM +medium "Tainted Updates Testing" is up-to-date +unlocking urpmi database +getting lock on urpmi +using mirror <A HREF="ftp://distrib-">ftp://distrib-</A> +coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/Mageia/distrib/1/i586 +examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Updates/synthesis.hdlist.cz] +examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Updates +Testing/synthesis.hdlist.cz] +examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Nonfree Updates/synthesis.hdlist.cz] +examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Nonfree Updates +Testing/synthesis.hdlist.cz] +examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Tainted Updates/synthesis.hdlist.cz] +examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Tainted Updates +Testing/synthesis.hdlist.cz] + +[...] +><i> >> 1) we know there will be cases where it won't work +</I>><i> >> (see above those with the DVD media and not the full network +</I>><i> >> media, some new dependencies won't be found on the DVD, ...). +</I>><i> >> Multiply by those who have installed 32 DVD, 64 DVD, dual arch DVD, +</I>><i> >> ... There are lots of different scenarios to deal with ... +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > I think most of us are ready to ask users to add the full media set along +</I>><i> > with updates media. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> And still you won't catch the users that won't ask you, that won't read the +</I>><i> doc, ... +</I>><i> You can increase the % of end users that will be covered but I fear you +</I>><i> won't even cover 50% of them. +</I> +Yes, that is something we will have to decide independently of bug 2137 : do +we still want self-contained updates media in the future (when the mdv=>mga +transition problem will be gone) or not. I don't know, I see drawbacks in both +ways. +If the tools add the whole media set by default (removing the button that +proposes only updates media), and if we add proper warnings and helpers in the +right place (for example have MageiaUpdate and/or rpmdrake detect the lack of +activated release media and propose to add them, the way it does for update +media currently), we should cover much more than 50% of the end-users. + +Also, a message such as "Sorry, the following package cannot be selected: +- msec-0.80.10-2.2.mga1.i586 (due to unsatisfied sendmail)" is much more +understandable when you *don't* have release media available on your system +than when you do. Especially when starting the update tool you already got a +message saying that you should activate the release media. + +So the main argument that I would keep in favor of copying dependencies to +updates media would be if we want to support the mirroring of updates media +only. But I'm not sure it is worth the extra work (although I may be wrong). + +[...] +><i> +</I>><i> > The main difficulty is handling the transition, but this is +</I>><i> > doable too. For people who might disable release media, this may be a +</I>><i> > problem, but is there really an interesting use case for disabling +</I>><i> > release media and activating updates media ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Whether it's either interesting or not, some people just do that. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Or play with /etc/urpmi/skip.list. +</I>><i> Another scenario I didn't bring attention upon.. +</I> +Indeed. But those should understand the error message I hope (and if they +don't, well, *they* played with the skip list :) ). + +><i> >> Will you provides patches, test scenario and do the testing? +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Patches, not sure. Test scenarios is doable, testing too. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> The faillure of the proposed patch should be a scenario for regression +</I>><i> testing btw. +</I> +Indeed. + +Best regards + +Samuel +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008288.html">[Mageia-dev] Meeting tonight +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008309.html">[Mageia-dev] Trying to solve bug #2317 (was: Re: Meeting tonight) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8308">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8308">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8308">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8308">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |