summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/007734.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/007734.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/007734.html133
1 files changed, 133 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/007734.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/007734.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b778f426a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/007734.html
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Status report for Mageia 1 updates, and call for help from you packagers
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Status%20report%20for%20Mageia%201%20updates%2C%0A%09and%20call%20for%20help%20from%20you%20packagers&In-Reply-To=%3C201109011216.19806.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="007801.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="007738.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Status report for Mageia 1 updates, and call for help from you packagers</H1>
+ <B>Samuel Verschelde</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Status%20report%20for%20Mageia%201%20updates%2C%0A%09and%20call%20for%20help%20from%20you%20packagers&In-Reply-To=%3C201109011216.19806.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Status report for Mageia 1 updates, and call for help from you packagers">stormi at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Sep 1 12:16:19 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007801.html">[Mageia-dev] Copying dependencies to Updates (Testing), or changing mgaapplet to use urpmi --auto-update instead of urpmi --update.
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="007738.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release bluedevil-1.2-0.rc2.1.mga2
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#7734">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#7734">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#7734">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#7734">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le jeudi 25 ao&#251;t 2011 23:48:19, Stew Benedict a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On 08/25/2011 01:12 PM, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Le jeudi 25 ao&#251;t 2011 14:09:26, Stew Benedict a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; On 08/24/2011 08:50 PM, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Hi,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; I was told that QA Team's work's visibility needs to be improved, so as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; a team member I'll try to give you some sort of status report.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; - 1 has been validated by QA one month ago, but was assigned to
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; security team following updates policy for security fixes, and got not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; answer. We have to improve either the policy or the security team here
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; (or both).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Do you have a pointer to this bug? I'm not finding it in bugzilla. I'm
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; not sure what I can do with it once assigned back to secteam, aside from
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; write an advisory text. I don't have admin rights to release it, etc.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; (afaik). It was basically my understanding that the secteam role is to
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; initiate the bug, provide patches, POC, and advisory text and the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; maintainer do the update and pass it on to QA. I've stopped even
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; intiating because they are just sitting there in the new/unassigned
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; state. some for 2 months or more now. While a shiny new KDE is nice, not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; pushing updates for published vulnerabilities makes us look bad, imho.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; It's <A HREF="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I think the initial idea in the updates policy is that security fixes
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; have to be tested by secteam to ensure that the security problem is not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; there anymore, because sometimes the upstream or the packager fixes it
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; in a wrong way or does a mistake, so we need to ensure the security
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; problems are really fixed. Otherwise we risk saying that a security
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; issue is fixed when it's not. Obviously, this can't happen if the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; security team doesn't grow. Maybe some kind of joint effort from
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; security and QA could help ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I already know updates that have been pushed without the security fixes
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; being tested.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Also, the security bugs being open in bugzilla and not adressed by the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; packagers is a really big issue, that we have to find a way to fix as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; soon as possible. Can you give us a link to the list of pending security
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; issues ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> While I don't disagree with the theory, it's not workable with the
+</I>&gt;<i> current state, as I don't have enough free cycles to think about
+</I>&gt;<i> actually updating any packages an/or doing the testing. One has to keep
+</I>&gt;<i> in mind that in the past life this was nearly a full time job for 2
+</I>&gt;<i> people to identify, fix build, test, release updates for the supported
+</I>&gt;<i> releases. The people that have inquired about helping with security
+</I>&gt;<i> issues quickly go away when they find out how inglorious(sic) it is.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+What has been decided during latest packager meeting is that it's the QA team
+who will try to check that the security bugs are really fixed during QA testing
+(when it's possible), so that the security team doesn't need to do it and can
+concentrate on monitoring and finding about existing issues.
+
+So the procedure is :
+- security team identifies issues and creates bug reports
+- packagers fix bugs
+- QA team validates
+
+This way I hope the security team work becomes doable with our current
+ressources. It means also that we need a real commitment from packagers. QA
+team is already ready and testing.
+
+Best regards
+
+Samuel Verschelde
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007801.html">[Mageia-dev] Copying dependencies to Updates (Testing), or changing mgaapplet to use urpmi --auto-update instead of urpmi --update.
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="007738.html">[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release bluedevil-1.2-0.rc2.1.mga2
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#7734">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#7734">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#7734">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#7734">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>