summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009209.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009209.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009209.html141
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009209.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009209.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dff9e3c3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009209.html
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Please%20test%3A%20initscripts%2Bsystemd%20in%20updates_testing&In-Reply-To=%3C4EAC5E6F.6040409%40mageia.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009206.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009217.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing</H1>
+ <B>Thomas Backlund</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Please%20test%3A%20initscripts%2Bsystemd%20in%20updates_testing&In-Reply-To=%3C4EAC5E6F.6040409%40mageia.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing">tmb at mageia.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Oct 29 22:13:35 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009206.html">[Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009217.html">[Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9209">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9209">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9209">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9209">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>30.10.2011 01:16, Colin Guthrie skrev:
+&gt;<i> 'Twas brillig, and Thomas Backlund at 27/10/11 15:12 did gyre and gimble:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Then we need to move those libs to /lib(64)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> There is quite serious talk about deprecating /lib, /bin and /sbin and
+</I>&gt;<i> basically anything that is not in /usr (with exceptions for /home /root,
+</I>&gt;<i> /etc and a few others). Of course there are various flames about this
+</I>&gt;<i> idea (earth will collapse into sun etc.) but it's actually surprisingly
+</I>&gt;<i> well received thus far IMO.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Also, keep in mind that you're talking about moving a *lot* to / here...
+</I>&gt;<i> all the PCI/USB databases, all the udev setup, any application that udev
+</I>&gt;<i> might run in it's rules.... I won't reiterate what is written in the
+</I>
+So?
+it's less impact on / than stuffing all of /usr on /
+
+&gt;<i> link Olav already provided, but suffice to say the problem is neither
+</I>&gt;<i> new, not specific to systemd. It's just being highlighted by systemd.
+</I>&gt;<i> Please keep this in mind when commenting on this topic.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Interesting on how people think &quot;systemd is the solution to everything&quot;,
+and cant accept complaints when is screws up working systems....
+
+It's pretty much like Apple fans and their love for iCrap
+
+&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> That's just plain idiotic.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I somewhat agree. But even Fedora is suggesting not to have separate
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> /usr :(
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> That does not make it less idiotic. IIRC they employ the systemd creator
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> so...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But that doesn't make the idea any more or less idiotic.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The reasons stated (and this discussion happened many months ago) are
+</I>&gt;<i> all well understood and documented in the link provided by Olav.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It is NOT a systemd problem. It's a problem we have RIGHT NOW too, it's
+</I>&gt;<i> just that most setups are easy enough to work around by waiting and
+</I>&gt;<i> doing this sequentially which slows down the whole boot process. We've
+</I>&gt;<i> solved similar problems in the past by moving things to /lib but it's
+</I>&gt;<i> just a sticking plaster, not a real fix.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+What's the difference of moving stuff to /lib as compared moving all of
+/usr into / besides bloating /
+
+And by chasing seconds in bootup you screw those who want to finetune
+their systems. Thats a regression.
+
+For those people that are so concerned about bootup times, why dont
+they buy new hw, use fast ssd and learn how to suspend to ram/resume ...
+
+
+&gt;<i> If you have constructive criticism as to the reasons why this is now
+</I>&gt;<i> warned about specifically in systemd, then this is perfectly valid but
+</I>&gt;<i> should be done in context rather than simply calling it &quot;idiotic&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> without any further clarification.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Well, it _is_ idiotic if it breaks working setups / possibilities to
+finetune systems.
+
+&gt;<i> And systemd is not saying that /usr cannot be on a separate partition.
+</I>&gt;<i> It's just saying that it cannot realistically be the job of the init
+</I>&gt;<i> system to mount it, it has to be handled at early boot in the initramfs,
+</I>&gt;<i> not by init. The reasons why this is the case are documented very clearly.
+</I>
+So by this reasoning we should stuff everything we can into initramfs,
+and not care of partitioning / mount points at all.
+
+--
+Thomas
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009206.html">[Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009217.html">[Mageia-dev] Please test: initscripts+systemd in updates_testing
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9209">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9209">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9209">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9209">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>