summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009588.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009588.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009588.html115
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009588.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009588.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..129dc3216
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009588.html
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EC40509.9080400%40gmx.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009575.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009521.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
+ <B>Kamil Rytarowski</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EC40509.9080400%40gmx.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">n54 at gmx.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Nov 16 19:46:33 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009575.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009521.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9588">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9588">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9588">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9588">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>qemu/GNS3 related post
+
+@Michael Scherer
+
+I've asked today the maintainers. There were patches for qemu since
+0.11, and they had problems with Linux and BSD distros - only recently
+they decided to push it upstream, because only openSUSE was ready to
+patch qemu against required enhancements. So they started to campaign
+harder (ask the community to campaign) to include the patch into the
+upstream release.
+
+They have successfully pushed a patch against VirtualBox 4.1 and now
+they wait for Qemu, and hope to be inside 1.0 (but nobody is sure).
+
+My propsition is to patch (I will do that) GNS3 in Mageia1 against patch
+to disable qemu/qemuwrapper features in GUI and import into Mga1 through
+updates (by hands of my mentor) dynamips (requirement of GNS3).
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009575.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009521.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9588">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9588">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9588">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9588">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>