diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009573.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009573.html | 179 |
1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009573.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009573.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..05081dbd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009573.html @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EC32E69.2030201%40gmx.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009521.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009504.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1> + <B>Kamil Rytarowski</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EC32E69.2030201%40gmx.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">n54 at gmx.com + </A><BR> + <I>Wed Nov 16 04:30:49 CET 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009521.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009504.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release iptables-1.4.12.1-7.mga2 +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#9573">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#9573">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#9573">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#9573">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On 14.11.2011 14:47, Buchan Milne wrote: +><i> On Saturday, 12 November 2011 22:11:31 Kamil Rytarowski wrote: +</I>>><i> On 12.11.2011 20:20, Michael Scherer wrote: +</I>>>><i> Le samedi 12 novembre 2011 à 16:44 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : +</I>>>>><i> There is also one important patch missed in Mageia - +</I>>>>><i> <A HREF="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html</A> +</I>>>>><i> it's +</I>>>>><i> dependency for the GNS3 simulator. OpenSUSE already includes it +</I>>>>><i> <A HREF="https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&project=openSUSE%3">https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&project=openSUSE%3</A> +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> ATools +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> If nobody is against I will do it and contact the maintainer (misc). +</I>>>><i> I prefer to wait on the stable release ( ie, no rc1 ). +</I>>>><i> We will wait on stable version of qemu. +</I>>><i> OK +</I>>><i> +</I>>>><i> And no patch unless it comes from upstream ( and even, I am not keen on +</I>>>><i> backporting feature, better wait for stable release ). +</I>>><i> GNS3 is already in stable! This package is broken - no dynamips (=no +</I>>><i> router emulation at all...), +</I>><i> Well, for me, I upgraded from Mandriva, and AFAIK there has been no new +</I>><i> release of dynamips in the past year => grab the package from +</I>><i> Mandriva for +</I>><i> nwo, and log an enhancement bug (you can assign to me) for dynamips. +</I>Dynamips is already imported into Mageia - it needs a review from my +mentor. This software is abandoned by its creator(s), and now without a +maintainer. It is developed in free time by GNS3 developers. + +And NO. There was new "community" release in this year. +This is officially a fork and de facto considered as the main branch +<A HREF="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gns-3/files/Dynamips/0.2.8-RC3-community/">http://sourceforge.net/projects/gns-3/files/Dynamips/0.2.8-RC3-community/</A> +><i> +</I>>><i> no patched qemu (no virtualization support +</I>>><i> at all...) According to the developers and their online documentation +</I>>><i> for package maintainers <A HREF="http://forum.gns3.net/post11571.html">http://forum.gns3.net/post11571.html</A> UDP patched +</I>>><i> Qemu is dependency/very important. +</I>><i> Can you provide a bit more information on what GNS3 feature needs this +</I>><i> patched +</I>><i> qemu? I have in the past hooked up my kvm VMs to dynamips routers (before +</I>><i> GNS3). +</I>GNS3 contain qemuwrapper to help emulate connections between multiple +PCs through virtual (emulated) router on one single (but not limited to +only one) machine. It uses UDP networking. You can chose your ready to +use image for qemu - in GNS3 menu - (for example with JunOS - there +are downloadable ready to use images with different OS) and immediately +have it working. + +Honestly I haven't been testing it with qemu - I have probably to wait +for possible upstream patch or make it finally myself. + +There are some official images +<A HREF="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gns-3/files/Qemu%20Appliances/">http://sourceforge.net/projects/gns-3/files/Qemu%20Appliances/</A> +><i> Is this for Pix emulation, or just for launching generic virtual +</I>><i> machines/emulated hardware as part of your lab? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> I really don't think the Pix emulation (I have never seen a maintained +</I>><i> patch) +</I>><i> is ready for anyone to include it ... but I haven't looked recently. +</I>For Pix there is as far as I know pemu. Pemu was for afaik for qemu +0.9.x series and it's to old to push to upstream. +>><i> We must fix the package and provide at least not so heavy broken ones... +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> I've prepared new version of GNS3, included into svn dynamips +</I>><i> Did you base it on the existing Mandriva package? +</I>I based on Mageia already existing package and then to make it working I +based on others distros (especially openSUSE) and FreeBSD ports. + +>><i> and +</I>>><i> xdotool (this one suggested) - these I can maintain with my mentor, so I +</I>>><i> ask for patch qemu in stable versus UDP support. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Regards, +</I>><i> Buchan +</I></PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009521.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009504.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release iptables-1.4.12.1-7.mga2 +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#9573">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#9573">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#9573">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#9573">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |