summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009501.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009501.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009501.html195
1 files changed, 195 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009501.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009501.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f940cc877
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009501.html
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EBEA55F.9030204%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009500.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009502.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
+ <B>Anne Nicolas</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EBEA55F.9030204%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">ennael1 at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Nov 12 17:57:03 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009500.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009502.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9501">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9501">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9501">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9501">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le 12/11/2011 16:44, Kamil Rytarowski a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Let me paste from the Arch Linux wiki documentation:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> --
+</I>&gt;<i> Difference between qemu and qemu-kvm
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Depending on your needs, you can choose either to install upstream qemu
+</I>&gt;<i> or qemu-kvm from the official repositories.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Upstream QEMU is a pure emulator, with no hardware acceleration. qemu
+</I>&gt;<i> versions &lt; 0.15.0 do have initial KVM support when QEMU is started with
+</I>&gt;<i> the -enable-kvm parameter, but this implementation is still buggy and
+</I>&gt;<i> nowhere as complete as in qemu-kvm, as many functions still do not work.
+</I>&gt;<i> Starting with qemu version 0.15.0, the qemu-kvm tree has been fully
+</I>&gt;<i> integrated with the qemu tree, and there should not be any difference
+</I>&gt;<i> between qemu -enable-kvm and qemu-kvm. See the [QEMU changelog] for more
+</I>&gt;<i> details.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Upstream QEMU is capable of emulating many different platforms (arm,
+</I>&gt;<i> i386, m68k, mips, ppc, sparc, x86_64, etc). On the other hand, you have
+</I>&gt;<i> qemu-kvm, which is qemu (i386 and x86_64 architecture support only) with
+</I>&gt;<i> KVM (kernel-based virtual machine) additions, allowing you to run
+</I>&gt;<i> virtual machines at close to native speed. qemu-kvm is the version you
+</I>&gt;<i> want if you have a CPU that supports hardware virtualization and you
+</I>&gt;<i> only need to run virtual machines for the i386 and x86_64 architectures
+</I>&gt;<i> (Linux, Windows, BSD, etc).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Not all processors support KVM. You will need an x86-based machine
+</I>&gt;<i> running a recent ( &gt;= 2.6.22 ) Linux kernel on an Intel processor with
+</I>&gt;<i> VT-x (virtualization technology) extensions or an AMD processor with SVM
+</I>&gt;<i> (Secure Virtual Machine) extensions (also called AMD-V). Xen has a
+</I>&gt;<i> complete list of compatible processors. For Intel processors, see also
+</I>&gt;<i> the Intel&#174; Virtualization Technology List.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/QEMU#Difference_between_qemu_and_qemu-kvm">https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/QEMU#Difference_between_qemu_and_qemu-kvm</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> --
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And now from the qemu changelog
+</I>&gt;<i> ~~
+</I>&gt;<i> KVM
+</I>&gt;<i> Common
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Countless fixes ported over from qemu-kvm, core is now shared with
+</I>&gt;<i> that tree, i.e. has the same quality
+</I>&gt;<i> Pimped up threading model, now fully synchronized with qemu-kvm tree
+</I>&gt;<i> Removed dependency on external kernel headers, all supported KVM
+</I>&gt;<i> features are now built into the binary
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/0.15#KVM">http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/0.15#KVM</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> ~~
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> What do you think? Can we move?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> There is also one important patch missed in Mageia -
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html</A> it's
+</I>&gt;<i> dependency for the GNS3 simulator. OpenSUSE already includes it
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&amp;project=openSUSE%3ATools">https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&amp;project=openSUSE%3ATools</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If nobody is against I will do it and contact the maintainer (misc).
+</I>
+ You should also contact pterjan wo was maintainer for a long time
+
+--
+Anne
+<A HREF="http://mageia.org">http://mageia.org</A>
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009500.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009502.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9501">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9501">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9501">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9501">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>