diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006165.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006165.html | 77 |
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006165.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006165.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7a92ccfda --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006165.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Update%20of%20backport%2C%20policy%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C201106301634.10720.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006163.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005982.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal</H1> + <B>Samuel Verschelde</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Update%20of%20backport%2C%20policy%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C201106301634.10720.stormi%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal">stormi at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Jun 30 16:34:10 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006163.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005982.html">[Mageia-dev] Monitoring of new GNOME/upstream releases +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#6165">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#6165">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#6165">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#6165">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE> +Le jeudi 30 juin 2011 15:59:21, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : +><i> Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 02:15:03, Michael Scherer a écrit : +</I>><i> > However, this mean that someone will have to check if the bug +</I>><i> > is fixed, and the question is "who" ( and I do not have a answer that I +</I>><i> > find good enough yet ). This could even be more tricky if we consider +</I>><i> > that this can be a version upgrade, and a security fix. Even if we trust +</I>><i> > the upstream to fix the security issue, we still want to have it +</I>><i> > working. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> That's a good question, given that priority will be given to stable updates +</I>><i> testing rather than backports. With a big security team I would say "the +</I>><i> security team", but for now I would trust the upstream here. +</I> +Or rather, "the packager who backported the software, with the help of the +security team and/or QA team if needed". + +Samuel + +</PRE> + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006163.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005982.html">[Mageia-dev] Monitoring of new GNOME/upstream releases +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#6165">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#6165">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#6165">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#6165">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |