summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006075.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006075.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006075.html135
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006075.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006075.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..786a02731
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006075.html
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20of%20a%20backporting%20process&In-Reply-To=%3C4E0931D5.8050704%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006017.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006018.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20of%20a%20backporting%20process&In-Reply-To=%3C4E0931D5.8050704%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Jun 28 03:43:49 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006017.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006018.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6075">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6075">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6075">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6075">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Samuel Verschelde a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 21:39:51, Ahmad Samir a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On 24 June 2011 02:09, Michael Scherer&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>
+...
+
+&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - I am not sure on this part, but basically, we have 2 choices :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - the packager take the cauldron package and push to backport testing
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - the packager move the cauldron package in svn to backport, and there
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> send it to backport testing.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Proposal 1 mean less work duplication, but proposal 2 let us do more
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> customization.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Option 1 doesn't only mean not duplicating work, but also that the the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> spec in backports svn isn't ever out-dated; the only reason I see a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> package being in stable distro SVN is if it's in /release|updates, not
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backports...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I'm not sure I understand your point. What do you mean with out-dated specs in
+</I>&gt;<i> backports ?
+</I>&gt;<i> I favor option 2 (with all needed useful shortcuts in mgarepo and BS to make
+</I>&gt;<i> it simple for packagers) because it allows to cope with the following
+</I>&gt;<i> situation :
+</I>&gt;<i> - foo is in version 1.2.2 in release|updates
+</I>&gt;<i> - foo is in version 2.0alpha in cauldron, full of bugs but hopefully ready for
+</I>&gt;<i> the next stable release
+</I>&gt;<i> - the latest release in the 1.x branch, 1.3.0, brings many features requested
+</I>&gt;<i> by some users, we want to provide it as a backport : with option 1 we can't,
+</I>&gt;<i> with option 2 we can.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> or :
+</I>&gt;<i> - foo is in version 1.2.2 in release|updates
+</I>&gt;<i> - foo is in version 2.0alpha in cauldron, full of bugs but hopefully ready for
+</I>&gt;<i> the next stable release
+</I>&gt;<i> - we had backported version 1.2.6 before switching to 2.0alpha in cauldron
+</I>&gt;<i> - the backported version 1.2.6 has a big bug we hadn't spotted during tests
+</I>&gt;<i> and we want to fix in the backport : with option 1 we can't, with option 2 we
+</I>&gt;<i> can.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So, for me, this is definitely option 2.
+</I>
+Given this explanation, I would definitely go for option 2 as well.
+
+&gt;<i> However, I think it must be made a painless as possible to packagers :
+</I>&gt;<i> - in the common case, allow to submit directly from cauldron to the backports
+</I>&gt;<i> media, but let the BS detect that and automatically do the SVN copy part.
+</I>&gt;<i> - for the situations I described above, work with the backport branch
+</I>&gt;<i> similarly as we work on updates (technically speaking : SVN, BS...).
+</I>
+Sound good to me.
+
+&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> if the package doesn't build, the packager fix ( or drop the idea if
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> this requires too much work )
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - the packager send requesting feedback about the backport from the
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> people who requested it, and test it as well.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Probably off-topic, but how will that work with madb? i.e. how will
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the maintainer get the feedback?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I partially answered above : either via bugzilla, or via a simple tracking
+</I>&gt;<i> system included in madb for that need. It will depend on the chosen process,
+</I>&gt;<i> we'll try to adapt the tool to the situation.
+</I>
+I tend to like the idea of using bugzilla with a streamlined template, to avoid
+unnecessary duplication of code to be maintained.
+But if madb can track things better, and it can be readily developed, that sounds good.
+As for packagers, it shouldn't make much difference if the tools are done right.
+
+&gt;<i> Best regards
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Samuel Verschelde
+</I>
+Regards
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006017.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006018.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6075">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6075">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6075">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6075">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>