summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005971.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005971.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005971.html134
1 files changed, 134 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005971.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005971.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..aaf90954b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005971.html
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Firefox%205&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTim8AqA5Vwk-SBHcpyxJjHubsNgYWQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005972.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005973.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5</H1>
+ <B>Ahmad Samir</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Firefox%205&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTim8AqA5Vwk-SBHcpyxJjHubsNgYWQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5">ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Jun 24 00:17:57 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005972.html">[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005973.html">[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#5971">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#5971">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#5971">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#5971">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 23 June 2011 23:48, David W. Hodgins &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">davidwhodgins at gmail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:52:30 -0400, Ahmad Samir &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com</A>&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On 23 June 2011 07:58, Dexter Morgan &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">dmorganec at gmail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> yes it needs to go to backports_testing before iirc
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Got a link to a thread on -dev ML / irc meeting log / &lt;insert your
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> favourite communication method here&gt;, where this was decided?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This mailing list, thread &quot;Release cycles proposals, and discussion&quot;,
+</I>&gt;<i> messageid BANLkTimrPR-=<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">UgQOnfvAkqPft80LNi9seQ at mail.gmail.com</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Where Anne posted ...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> exactly what I had in mind. Having backports can allow choice between
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;the last version of&quot; and &quot;the stable version with which I'm happy
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> with&quot;. But indeed we need more quality in backport rpms that is policy
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and tests.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> In order for the qa team to perform the tests, before they go to the
+</I>&gt;<i> backports repository, they have to go to to the testing repository
+</I>&gt;<i> first.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+1) It doesn't say &quot;we're going to use backports_testing&quot;, does it?
+guessing != an instated policy
+2) IMHO, QA is too small to handle backports too
+
+&gt;<i> Something that works in cauldron may not work when moved to backports,
+</I>&gt;<i> if a dependency is missed. &#160;By using backports_testing, we can catch
+</I>&gt;<i> that before it hits the average user.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Regards, Dave Hodgins
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Right so, the plan is:
+- A packager submits to backports_testing and assigns to QA
+- QA tests, the package is good to go
+- The report is assigned to &lt;whoever has privileges to move packages
+from backports_testing to backports&gt;, atm that's sysadm team
+- Package is moved and the report closed
+
+Caveats:
+- QA is too small, and it'll take time/effort to get through the
+backported packages requiring tests, unless you depend on the user
+asking for the backport to have tested the package properly, the user
+will say it works if it works on his box for the arch he's using, he
+won't do both archs, not just because he's lazy, but maybe he has one
+Mageia box for example
+- Sysadm team is already overworked with many other tasks, meaning the
+packages requiring a move will rot for a while in backports_testing.
+
+Now compare that to what's used in e.g. mdv:
+- User asks for a backport
+- Packager submits the backport and closes the report
+
+Do you see the problem I am talking about yet? adding more complexity
+to backporting may result in less backports; the more the hoops, the
+less the backports, the more the users' complaints about
+I-want-the-latest-version-of-foo-yesterday.
+
+The &quot;quality of backports&quot; is a sentence that lacks statistics and
+numbers; in e.g. mdv, how many packages were backported to release
+foo? how many of them worked(tm)? how many of them didn't work and
+required a bit of fixing? how many of them didn't work and won't work
+due to any number of reasons?
+
+I think backports in mdv worked pretty well all those years, not all
+of them worked, but most of them did.
+
+--
+Ahmad Samir
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005972.html">[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005973.html">[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#5971">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#5971">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#5971">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#5971">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>