diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005616.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005616.html | 190 |
1 files changed, 190 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005616.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005616.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b17188573 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005616.html @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C1308059026.24304.211.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005670.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005621.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1> + <B>Michael Scherer</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C1308059026.24304.211.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">misc at zarb.org + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Jun 14 15:43:45 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005670.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005621.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#5616">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#5616">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#5616">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#5616">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le mardi 14 juin 2011 à 07:55 +0200, Thorsten van Lil a écrit : +><i> Am Montag, 13. Juni 2011, 23:28:04 schrieb Renaud MICHEL: +</I>><i> > On lundi 13 juin 2011 at 23:06, Thorsten van Lil wrote : +</I>><i> > > A rolling release has following advantages: +</I>><i> > > 1. the distribution is always up to date (also hardware support) +</I>><i> > > 2. no re-install over and over again +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > I don't get it why people think a re-install is necessary. +</I>><i> > My current computer was installed with mandriva 2007 (don't remember if it +</I>><i> > was .0 or .1), it is now mageia 1 and has been updated to all intermediary +</I>><i> > mdv releases. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> An Upgrade is nearly the same, than reinstalling. The difference is only, that +</I>><i> you can use your system in the mean time and you are not forced to install the +</I>><i> missing packages. +</I> +Rolling is just the same as upgrade, except it take X months to do it +with a small change everyday instead of having thing upgraded every X +months. + +><i> > > This could look like this: +</I>><i> > > Bring up a release once a year. The core (kernel, glib, ...) will only +</I>><i> > > get minor updates. Apllications like firefox, libreoffice, ... will +</I>><i> > > always be up to date (rolling). Maybe also the desktop envirenments +</I>><i> > > could be rolling but this is very heavy. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > If I understood correctly, that is exactly what the backports should +</I>><i> > provide, new versions of programs when possible (no update of half of the +</I>><i> > core system libraries). +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Yes, but Backports are not officially supported and we wouldn't advice new users +</I>><i> to backports normally. +</I> +I am sorry, but I fail to follow your reasoning. + +Why wouldn't you do a comparison where in one case not recommend +backports, and in the others, recommend them for the whole system ? + +If this is for ressource related reasons, why would we have the +ressources in one case and not in the others ? + +And as I said in another mail, if people want to follow arch linux and +do a better job, maybe they should start to explain what are the weak +points of the distribution and then do proposal on stuff that can be +done better instead of asking to copy cat hoping this would be better. + +-- +Michael Scherer + +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005670.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005621.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#5616">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#5616">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#5616">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#5616">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |