diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005503.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005503.html | 192 |
1 files changed, 192 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005503.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005503.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f8f4c8b5e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005503.html @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTim3UMCYR58L%2B%3Dya_T0jBe0QsLTrNQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005499.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005507.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1> + <B>David Sjölin</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTim3UMCYR58L%2B%3Dya_T0jBe0QsLTrNQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">david.sjolin at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Mon Jun 13 15:00:11 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005499.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005507.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#5503">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#5503">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#5503">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#5503">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Thomas Backlund <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tmb at mageia.org</A>> wrote: +><i> Wolfgang Bornath skrev 13.6.2011 15:20: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> About the cycles: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> The 9-months seem to be a compromise - but I start to ask why we need +</I>>><i> such a fixed statement (which it would be, once published). We need a +</I>>><i> schedule for each cycle, that's true. Without a schedule we would +</I>>><i> never finish anything. But how about taking 9 months only as a "nice +</I>>><i> to meet" target, leaving us the option to set a roadmap after setting +</I>>><i> the specs of the next release - we could then go for a 8 or 10 months +</I>>><i> roadmap, depending on the specs. +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> This is somewhat like what I had in my mind to write too, but you beat me to +</I>><i> it :) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> It could allow us to adapt a little for upstream releases. +</I>><i> But should we then decide that the limit is +/- 1 month ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Obviously there will still be people complaining that "you waited 10 +</I>><i> months... if you had extended with ~2 more weeks... "this" or "that" +</I>><i> package would have been available too... and so on.... +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> And something not to forget (this is more related to the specs): +</I>><i> +</I>><i> If an estimated upstream release of kde/gnome/... seem to fit our +</I>><i> schedule it _must_ be in Cauldron before version freeze so we +</I>><i> actually get some test/qa on it and not try to force it in by +</I>><i> "hey it's released ~x days before final mageia release so it +</I>><i>  must be added" attitude that tends to pop up at every freeze. +</I> +This point and the one above ("if you had extended...") seems to be +arguments for a fixed time release cycle? With a fixed release cycle +no one would question why we didn't wait for the release of a new +gnome/kde/<any package which someone wants>, since waiting the extra +weeks would go against the release cycle. I'm not sure if that is +enough of an argument against having a looser release cycle but... But +then again, I can see the point of having the possibility to be a bit +flexible. +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005499.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005507.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#5503">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#5503">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#5503">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#5503">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |