summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005461.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005461.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005461.html210
1 files changed, 210 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005461.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005461.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ed058c883
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005461.html
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C201106130156.22621.r.h.michel%2Bmageia%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005464.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005463.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1>
+ <B>Renaud MICHEL</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C201106130156.22621.r.h.michel%2Bmageia%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">r.h.michel+mageia at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Jun 13 01:56:22 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005464.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005463.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#5461">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#5461">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#5461">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#5461">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hello
+On Sunday 12 June 2011 at 22:46, Michael Scherer wrote :
+&gt;<i> To simplify the discussion, the proposals are all based on the fact that
+</I>&gt;<i> 2 or 3 releases could be supported at a time. We could have different
+</I>&gt;<i> schemes for that ( LTS every X release ( ubuntu ), different level of
+</I>&gt;<i> support ( mandriva )), but as this is a slightly different discussion,
+</I>&gt;<i> let's assume 2 supported releases for now, and let's discuss later for
+</I>&gt;<i> that ( ie next week, once this one is finished )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And roughly, to start the discussion, we have 3 potential releases
+</I>&gt;<i> cycles, based on all inputs we had :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Proposal 1:
+</I>&gt;<i> 6 months release cycle -&gt; 12 months life cycle
+</I>&gt;<i> ( Fedora, Ubuntu, Mandriva &lt; 2010.1 &amp;&amp; Mandriva != 2006.0 )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Proposal 2:
+</I>&gt;<i> 9 months release cycle -&gt; 18 months life cycle
+</I>&gt;<i> ( ~ opensuse and the one we used for Mageia 1 )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Proposal 3:
+</I>&gt;<i> 12 months release cycle -&gt; 24 months life cycle
+</I>&gt;<i> ( Mandriva &gt; 2010.1 )
+</I>
+From a long time mandriva (and now mageia) user POV, for myself I was quite
+fine with 6 month release cycle, but at work I'd rather not update too
+frequently and same goes for the rest of the family who generally don't care
+much for newer versions. And I know that for some people, a big upgrade
+every 6 month is a lot of work (and skipping a release is more risky).
+
+So I think either proposal #2 or #3 would do, my preference depending on how
+much could be backported to the latest stable release.
+What I mean is, if it is possible to have backports of newer releases for
+big projects, like KDE (and other DEs), libreoffice, firefox, samba
+(important at work), ..., then I am fine with a 1 year release cycle of
+proposal #3.
+
+If the maintainer of such big projects (especially the DEs) think it would
+be too hard to backports newer versions to the 8-10 months old stack of the
+latest stable release (as I have seen recently such discussions on KDE MLs),
+then I would prefer proposal #2 to not be lacking behind too much.
+
+cheers
+--
+Renaud Michel
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005464.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005463.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#5461">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#5461">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#5461">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#5461">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>