summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010363.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010363.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010363.html146
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010363.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010363.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..99ea558ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010363.html
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Opening%20Backports%20%28once%20again...%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201112111711.52603.alien%40rmail.be%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010350.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="010365.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)</H1>
+ <B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Opening%20Backports%20%28once%20again...%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201112111711.52603.alien%40rmail.be%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)">alien at rmail.be
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Dec 11 17:11:52 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010350.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010365.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10363">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10363">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10363">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10363">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Op zondag 11 december 2011 11:41:02 schreef Angelo Naselli:
+&gt;<i> sabato 10 dicembre 2011 alle 17:09, Thomas Backlund ha scritto:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Sorry, buth this wont work in reality...
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Consider this:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; version X in Mageia 1
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; version X+1 in Cauldron
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; version X+1 gets backported.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; version X+2 uploaded in Cauldron
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; version X+2 cant be backported (depends on updated libs/packages in
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Cauldron, and we dont backport libs that can break working setups)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; version X+1 in backports need to be fixed (security/maintenance fix)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; (here your logic breaks down, there is no place to fix it)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; And since we aim for quality backports, the maintainer may want to
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; stay with version X+1 in backports even if X+2 could be backported
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; if maintainer think X+2 isn't a good candidate for some reason.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So, couldn't we consider backports in the same way as updates?
+</I>&gt;<i> The only difference is that they go into another branch, and they
+</I>&gt;<i> need to have a higher version than in updates and lower than cauldron.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Tests and validations follow the same rules, if a backport is not
+</I>&gt;<i> validated won't be pushed.
+</I>&gt;<i> Is that more work for QA? unfortunately yes, but i do hope tests
+</I>&gt;<i> and validations can be done by more users interested in that
+</I>&gt;<i> update/backport.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Why using backports instead of updates then? because for some reasons
+</I>&gt;<i> we -or maintainers- don't want to push as update a new version.
+</I>&gt;<i> I'm not really in favour of a strict release update, we have already
+</I>&gt;<i> pacakges not doing that (leaf ones, or those that are a pain to patch like
+</I>&gt;<i> ff for instance,...).
+</I>&gt;<i> In such a way backports is not going to be seen as a potential breakage of
+</I>&gt;<i> the system, but as a part of distro life.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> A problem i can see though is if a maintainer decides that a version
+</I>&gt;<i> that has been backported can become an update, even if it can be
+</I>&gt;<i> managed by working on release version, that update is svn and HD room
+</I>&gt;<i> effect...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Angelo
+</I>
+you can have new version as updates.
+
+backporting is the addition of new features and thus the possibility of new
+bugs, even with QA, you can't completely get the same level of stability from
+updates, as you get from backports...
+
+but that's fine. it doesn't need to be, it's not enabled by default, it'd be
+nice if those work well.
+
+what we really want is for backports to be suggested in rpmdrake on a case by
+case basis.
+
+since fixing bugs is more important that adding new features and some people do
+updates, but don't want any risk, it's completely valid that they are
+separate.
+
+i just vote that we make a svn backports branch, (NOT a separate repos, it'd
+be nice if we can just branch it, which doesn't use any extra disk space), for
+some packages it means we can add a patch on backports to make it work for
+mga1 specifically and still merge patches from cauldron into backports if we
+want (or wherever we branch from)
+
+we should however keep matches close at a hand, in case people do weird
+things, some automated checks could be done and possibly mailed somewhere to
+show that suspicious activity is going on... if it's tmb, we know we can
+ignore it then.
+
+i think this is by far the most flexible solution, and we should try to keep
+our level of maintainers high, but informing them of where it can go wrong,
+what they should look for...
+
+just my 0.02&#8364;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010350.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010365.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10363">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10363">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10363">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10363">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>