summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010251.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010251.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010251.html203
1 files changed, 203 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010251.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010251.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..33993836f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010251.html
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Opening%20Backports%20%28once%20again...%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4EDFB91C.1050105%40mageia.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010221.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="010253.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)</H1>
+ <B>Thomas Backlund</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Opening%20Backports%20%28once%20again...%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4EDFB91C.1050105%40mageia.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)">tmb at mageia.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Dec 7 20:06:04 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010221.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010253.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10251">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10251">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10251">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10251">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Anssi Hannula skrev 6.12.2011 01:29:
+&gt;<i> On 06.12.2011 00:56, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Now,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> here comes the question about backports once again.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> We are now 6+ months into Mageia 1, and we are nowhere closer to opening
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backports that we were at Mageia 1 release time.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Because of that there are 3rdparty repos popping up everywhere...,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> something we hoped to avoid atleast partly when starting this project.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> And at current rate we will probably release Mageia &quot;infinity&quot;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> before backports is opened.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> It has been delayed because of needed infrastructure changes,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> something no-one have had time to do so far...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I know there is &quot;only some coding missing&quot; and &quot;someone should
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> do it&quot;, buth truthfully there are only a few that knows the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> code used in the buildsystem enough to actually make it happend,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and they are already othervise busy or overloaded...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (this is no rant against them, as all here are using their
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> personal free time to help out)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The biggest problem for me is that it is really difficult to test any
+</I>&gt;<i> changes, one'd need a mockup of the whole buildsystem... and I don't
+</I>&gt;<i> want to propose any patches blind :)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> And to be honest I dont see that changing anytime soon...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So here is a suggestion to get some value to our endusers:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> we add a backports branch on svn
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So packages for backports would use:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> svn.mageia.org/packages/backports/1/&lt;package&gt;/{current,pristine,releases}
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and allow that to be used for backports.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Using a separate branch is also a cleaner way of providing
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backports, and makes it easy to separate changes needed only
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> for Cauldron (or backports).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Hm, how does this help with enabling backports (i.e. compared to simply
+</I>&gt;<i> using cauldron repo)?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+It was suggested to prevent direct submissions from cauldron as
+current BS is not capable of blocking cauldron -&gt; updates_testing
+if we add cauldron to supported url
+
+So a separate backports branch would be created to &quot;work around&quot; this.
+(yes I know you could do svn cp and then submit, but atleast it would
+ prevent submissions done by mistake)
+
+And if we want to extend the checks, maybe mgarepo could be updated to
+only allow submission to backports_testing from backports branch until
+server side checking is in place. (the same &quot;connection&quot; could probably
+be done between updates_testing and updates too)
+
+
+&gt;<i> Anyway, would the above branch work like this:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> e.g. lets imagine I want to, in order:
+</I>&gt;<i> 1. provide foobar 1.1 to backports.
+</I>&gt;<i> 2. cauldron foobar upgraded to 1.2, some patches added, some removed,
+</I>&gt;<i> and other changes
+</I>&gt;<i> 3. provide foobar 1.2 to backports
+</I>&gt;<i> 4. 1.3 to cauldron and backports
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> To backport foobar 1.1, I guess I'd simply do
+</I>&gt;<i> svn copy svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/foobar">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/foobar</A> \
+</I>&gt;<i> svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> and then the submit command.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> When time comes to provide foobar 1.2 to backports, the options are:
+</I>&gt;<i> Option 1:
+</I>&gt;<i> svn del svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> svn copy svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/foobar">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/foobar</A> \
+</I>&gt;<i> svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> and submit. Changelog is the same as in cauldron.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Option 2:
+</I>&gt;<i> svn checkout \
+</I>&gt;<i> svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar/current">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/backports/1/foobar/current</A> \
+</I>&gt;<i> foobar
+</I>&gt;<i> cd foobar&amp;&amp; svn merge -r prevrev:HEAD \
+</I>&gt;<i> svn+<A HREF="ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/foobar/current">ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/foobar/current</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> svn commit
+</I>&gt;<i> # copy all the log entries from the cauldron interval to the log msg
+</I>&gt;<i> and submit.
+</I>&gt;<i> Note: results in broken changelogs unless one does manual
+</I>&gt;<i> markreleases, but changelogs are already broken both in mga1 updates
+</I>&gt;<i> and in cauldron (youri issue [1]). This is more notable here, though,
+</I>&gt;<i> as backports happen generally more often multiple times than updates.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Repeat with 1.3.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Correct?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+I guess this is up to the maintainer how he/she wants to maintain the
+backports of his package as it can also be Option 3: maintain backports
+branch separately (depending on package).
+
+For example, for me I'd like to provide kernel-rt-3.0.x as backports,
+but would probably not provide 3.2.x at all for Mageia 1.
+
+(sidenote, kernel-rt is a little tricky here as it was available as
+ 2.6.33 series in 2010.2, so it could go to updates. but since it
+ would also need backported nvidia/fglrx (if they work that is),
+ and the /proc/net/route info changed in 2.6.39 so it would &quot;break&quot;
+ network detection too, and version 3.* could break some scripts
+ checking for 2.*, so I'd rather submit it as a backport.)
+
+&gt;<i> [1] <A HREF="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Yeah, this is another thing that needs to be fixed regardless of
+what we do with backports. for now we have just disabled markrel
+for updates so it does not mess up the changelogs even more.
+
+--
+Thomas
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010221.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010253.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10251">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10251">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10251">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10251">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>