summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001846.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001846.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001846.html158
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001846.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001846.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..54b877f3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001846.html
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20bugzilla&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikiFvH1H2GTRz%2Byz2NKnfFQJ%3D7AmfcGaQEeOQgq%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001864.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001847.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla</H1>
+ <B>Ahmad Samir</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20bugzilla&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikiFvH1H2GTRz%2Byz2NKnfFQJ%3D7AmfcGaQEeOQgq%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla">ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Dec 22 15:27:09 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001864.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001847.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1846">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1846">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1846">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1846">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 22 December 2010 01:32, Frederic Janssens &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">fjanss at gmail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Le mardi 14 d&#233;cembre 2010 &#224; 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; I would like to have your input to let us able to provide a bugzilla really soon
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So if I am not wrong, in bugzilla, we have :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - products
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - component, contained in products
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - and various field, per bug,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and the way we organize everything will impact the layout.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> In preparation of the future interaction (by xmlrpc) between the
+</I>&gt;<i> mageia-app-db site and the mageia bugzilla,&#160; I have been testing
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://bugs.mageia.org/">http://bugs.mageia.org/</A> .
+</I>&gt;<i> Xmlrpc works, but it will be necessary to configure additional fields.
+</I>&gt;<i> The minimum would be to add an 'RPM Package' field (such as exists on
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/">https://qa.mandriva.com/</A>).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+That's already agreed upon, whatever it's called, RPM Package or
+Component (I am in favour of the former).
+
+&gt;<i> But, as the configuration must be modified anyway, I have been
+</I>&gt;<i> thinking about what fields we need.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> First I think it would be usefull to have a multiline (Large Text Box)
+</I>&gt;<i> 'RPM Packages' field, instead of a single line (Free Text) field as
+</I>&gt;<i> used by mandriva.
+</I>&gt;<i> A single bug can concern more than one rpm. One thing mageia-app-db
+</I>&gt;<i> will do is search all bugs affecting an rpm. For that search to be
+</I>&gt;<i> meaningfull all affected rpms should be mentioned.
+</I>
+'One bug per report' is what we should do (did); if a bug originates
+from more than one package, a separate report for each of them should
+be opened with the Block/Dependency set correctly.
+
+&gt;<i> For the same reason, the way the rpms are mentioned should be 'standardised',
+</I>&gt;<i> as the search done by bugzilla can only be litteral.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Usually one doesn't only search in the RPM Package field; experience
+tell us that the affected package name will be mentioned many times in
+both the summary and the description.
+
+And if you want to search in the RPM Package field, bugzilla has many
+options to do so, look at the bottom of:
+<A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/query.cgi?format=advanced">https://qa.mandriva.com/query.cgi?format=advanced</A>
+
+&gt;<i> Something that does not exist in mandriva, but I think would be usefull, is a
+</I>&gt;<i> 'Fixed RPM Packages' that would be filled when the bug is fixed. FIXED
+</I>&gt;<i> is great, but where (or since which rpm)?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+IMHO, that's trivia; either the user is savvy enough / has the time to
+trudge through the bug report to find out which package release fixes
+an issue (which indicates he's the curious type, he'll at least skim
+through the bug report anyway), or he's just going to update his
+system and get the fix (the latter happens more often).
+
+&gt;<i> Perhaps also an 'Upstream' field which would, eventually, indicate
+</I>&gt;<i> where that bug is filed upstream.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+That's similar to the URL field in my proposal (see my previous post
+in this thread).
+
+&gt;<i> Finally the &quot;status whiteboard&quot; could be enabled, and used to clearly
+</I>&gt;<i> explain a workaround, for open bugs (instead of having to figure it
+</I>&gt;<i> from the comments). (Eventually this field could also be used as the
+</I>&gt;<i> 'Fixed RPM Packages' field when the bug is closed. So it would be the
+</I>&gt;<i> 'Solution' field)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+I don't think this will be adequately useful; if the issue is fixed,
+then all the user has to do is update his system. If it's not fixed
+and affects a stable release then it should get added to the Errata
+page for that release whether there's a workaround (or not); if it
+affects Cauldron, well, Cauldron users are supposed to be
+fireproof-ready, so they do read bug reports (or skim through them).
+
+&gt;<i> Apart from the &quot;status whiteboard&quot; which is a parameter to enable
+</I>&gt;<i> (<A HREF="http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/tip/en/html/parameters.html">http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/tip/en/html/parameters.html</A>);
+</I>&gt;<i> the fields must be added as custom-fields
+</I>&gt;<i> (<A HREF="http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.6/en/html/custom-fields.html">http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.6/en/html/custom-fields.html</A>)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> --
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Frederic
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+
+
+--
+Ahmad Samir
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001864.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001847.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1846">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1846">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1846">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1846">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>