summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101216/001737.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101216/001737.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101216/001737.html153
1 files changed, 153 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101216/001737.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101216/001737.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..330b0818d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101216/001737.html
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C201012160447.07148.ewilcox%40bex.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001738.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout</H1>
+ <B>Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C201012160447.07148.ewilcox%40bex.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout">ewilcox at bex.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Dec 16 10:47:07 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001738.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1737">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1737">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1737">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1737">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:44:21AM -0500, Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. wrote:
+|<i> &gt;Consideration of software patents and copyrights does not constitute | |
+</I>|<i> implicit
+</I> | &gt;support for them. It does however constitute explicit support for | |
+obediance of
+ | &gt;the law. Like it or not, patent and copyright laws do exist in some |
+countries
+ | &gt;(especially the U.S.A. - my home), and it is our responsibility to take
+those
+ | &gt;laws into considertion (whether we want to or not). Laws can not be
+changed by
+ | &gt;ignoring them, only broken. People who break laws are criminals - no ifs,
+ | &gt;ands, or buts, about it. If the Mageia community chooses to opeate as a
+ | &gt;criminal organization, I will have nothing to do with it.
+ | I don't agree on most of the above, and i believe the last sentence to be
+ | offensive, but i will not retaliate lest it becomes a flame war.
+
+I do not see how that statement is offensive. It is a simple statement of fact.
+If the Mageia community chooses to ignore the laws of some countries for any
+reason (even if the community can not be prosecuted), I want nothing to do
+with it. I do not believe that this will be the case, but that is how I feel.
+A strongly stated position, honestly presented should never cause offense to
+any one. If I havce offended you, I appologize as that was not my intent, but I
+will not appologize for my beliefs.
+
+ | &gt;We are discussing whether to accomodate software patent and copyright law
+in
+ | &gt;countries where it exists. I can see no way to avoud doing so. We can
+include
+ | &gt;patented software in our distribution if we choose to do so (and I think
+we
+ | &gt;should), but we must provide both mirror hosts and end users (including
+me) a
+ | &gt;method of easily excluding such software. By doing so, we give our users
+and
+ | &gt;supporters the freedom to choose to obey the law where they live and still
+use
+ | &gt;or support our distribution.
+ | The biggest problem is the variety of patent laws existing in the world,
+ | besides the fact that patents are not granted worldwide, thus forcing
+ | mageia to taint software that should not be under different
+ | legislations. See the difference between fair-use clauses in laws about
+ | circumvention devices.
+
+The variety of laws that exist is not the issue, the fact that they do exist
+is, and this is why I think PLF is a good place for &quot;questionable&quot; software.
+If we choose to provide such software ourselves, then it should be in a
+&quot;tainted&quot; listing or repo.
+
+ | &gt;As I see it, we already have a usable mirror lay-out (posted earlier in
+this
+ | &gt;thread). The only real discussion that should remain is whether to include
+the
+ | &gt;&quot;tainted&quot; branch in the official Mageia tree, or to offer it in an alternate
+ | &gt;repository such as PLF (my earlier suggestion).
+ | I don't believe a separate repository would give any benefit, in any
+ | case it would be software provided by mageia, and built on mageia
+ | build-cluster.
+
+If we place the &quot;tainted&quot; software in the official Mageia mirror, then it should
+be in its own directory. If we put it in PLF, then it will get its own
+repository as a natural course of events. In either case, what is most
+important is that the user be able to install Mageia without the potential
+risk that such software may present, then if the user chooses to install the
+&quot;questionable&quot; software, (s)he is making an informed decision.
+
+ | &gt;In either case, I do not believe that ALL patented (or Copyrighted)
+software
+ | &gt;should be placed there (in the &quot;tainted&quot; branch). Some such software comes
+ | &gt;with explicit permission to use (perhaps nVidia and/or ATI drivers?). In
+other
+ | &gt;cases, we may be able to contact the patent or copyright holder and get
+ | &gt;explicit permission to include their software in our distribution. In such
+ | &gt;cases, we should be able to safely (for both our users and supporters)
+include
+ | &gt;the patented / copyrighted software with the official branch of our
+ | &gt;distribution.
+ | Software with non-free license but permission to distribute should end
+ | in non-free, software with a non-free license and no permission to
+ | distribute should not be distributed. But this is a very different issue
+ | from free-software possibly breaking some patent. Please do not mix the
+ | two issues.
+
+I agree with both parts of your first statement. I was not thinking at all
+about free software that may break some patent, but perhaps I should have.
+There is free software that is known to be patent infringing (writing
+(creating) an mp3 file comes to mind). It is such software that should be
+placed separately (perhaps in a &quot;non-free&quot; or &quot;tainted&quot; directory) from the
+main Mageia distribution. I have no problem with such software being
+distributed where it is legal. I simply want to make it easy for end users and
+miror hosts to exclude this software where it is illegal. I will not enter
+into the argument that it is not illegal untill the patent holder comes after
+you. To my way of thinking, that feels very similar to saying that stealing is
+not a crime untill you get caught.
+
+--
+Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
+Registered Linux User 247790
+ICQ 41060744
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001738.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1737">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1737">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1737">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1737">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>