summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101211/001706.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101211/001706.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101211/001706.html128
1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101211/001706.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101211/001706.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..88aa31912
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101211/001706.html
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C4D036EB0.7090004%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001705.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001709.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C4D036EB0.7090004%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Dec 11 13:29:36 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001705.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001709.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1706">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1706">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1706">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1706">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Michael scherer a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:26:32PM -0500, andre999 wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Romain d'Alverny a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - for packaging/shipping the distribution
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Evidently easier to package. (One less consideration.)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> As well, the problem doesn't exist in France, so Mageia itself won't
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> be a target.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This is a over simplification.
+</I>&gt;<i> PLF is not only for patented softwares, but also for softwares that
+</I>&gt;<i> have others issues ( DMCA, copyright claim, etc ).
+</I>&gt;<i> So from a packaging point of view, we would still
+</I>&gt;<i> have a separate repository, so the consideration would
+</I>&gt;<i> likely still exist.
+</I>
+As for copyrighted material, I think we should only distribute material
+that has a licence permitting redistribution, or for which we have
+special permission to redistribute.
+As for other legally constrained packages, PLF is a reasonable solution.
+
+But I don't see the utility of being worried about patent-constrained
+software at this point, since it hasn't, to the best of my knowledge,
+impacted mirrors or end-users.
+
+BTW, industry publications here in Canada have a lot of articles about
+legal issues affecting software, and often discuss the situation in the
+U.S. On which I base much of my opinions.
+
+&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - for using it.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> It doesn't seem that any individual user has been pursued for using
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> unauthorised patent-affected software.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So using patent-affected software is a non-issue for users.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (Unless they choose to avoid such software, of course.)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> We should not only take care of individual users, companies can also use
+</I>&gt;<i> a linux distribution. See how debian is used in many embedded product, or Fedora
+</I>&gt;<i> for that matter.
+</I>&gt;<i> So no, this is not a non-issue for users, because there is more than
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;individual users&quot; in the users group.
+</I>
+Good. Remove &quot;individual&quot;, and my statement still stands.
+
+Note that there is a difference between
+- using or distributing software which may use patented technology, and
+- developing or selling such software for a profit.
+
+The former is little affected by patent claims in the U.S., but the
+latter has resulted in some spectacular cases.
+Like the recent case where a Texas court awarded a smalll canadian
+company over 200 million dollars for patent infringement claimed in
+Microsoft word, which Microsoft is appealing.
+Note that Ms-word is not exactly free.
+(It is a U.S. patent : Canada doesn't issue software patents.)
+
+Also note that end users, be they individuals or companies, have a
+choice of what software they install and use.
+In addition to what they integrate into their products to sell.
+So they will have the opportunity to react appropriately should problems
+arise.
+
+As will Mageia.
+
+- Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001705.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001709.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1706">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1706">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1706">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1706">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>