diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001694.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001694.html | 127 |
1 files changed, 127 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001694.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001694.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9907e6657 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001694.html @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C4D027EE8.1000904%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001695.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001687.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout</H1> + <B>andre999</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C4D027EE8.1000904%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout">andr55 at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Fri Dec 10 20:26:32 CET 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001695.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001687.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1694">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1694">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1694">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1694">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Romain d'Alverny a écrit : +><i> +</I>><i> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 16:35, Wolfgang Bornath<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>> wrote: +</I>>><i> Isn't this what this whole discussion is about? There ARE legal issues +</I>>><i> with some software users regard as "must have". Now, how do you avoid +</I>>><i> these issues? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> To summarize, strategies: +</I>><i> 1. ignore the issues and see what happens; +</I>><i> 2. ignore the less significant ones; +</I>><i> 3. get to know each of these and manage case by case +</I>><i> 4. other? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> and factor whenever possible and see what happens, update, repeat. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> 1. and 2. are more radical, but are some sort of trial-and-error, risk +</I>><i> management strategies. Ok... looking at it this way won't lead us +</I>><i> further I guess. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Let's try this: what if we consider, at first, that software patents +</I>><i> were a non-issue? (that is, we just consider they are all invalid as +</I>><i> such). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> How would this change/simplify the problem? +</I> +Good approach. + +><i> - for packaging/shipping the distribution +</I> +Evidently easier to package. (One less consideration.) +As well, the problem doesn't exist in France, so Mageia itself won't be +a target. +As I understand, basically only the editors of software have been +pursued in patent-affected countries like the U.S. +(And basically only those with lots of money.) + +><i> - for mirroring it +</I> +Easier if mirrors don't have to consider OPTIONAL repositories. +(But the NUMBER of repositories doesn't matter.) + +Theoretically it would affect mirrors in countries with patents. +Except that in the U.S., one of the most patent-affected countries, +there is no shortage of mirrors, many of which carry patented software +that is being actively pursued against other parties - but the mirrors +themselves are left untouched. + +Note that having identifiable patent-affected repositories would +presumably increase the probability of patent pursuits against a mirror. +But the PLF, with openly identified patent-affected packages, has +several mirrors in the U.S., none of which has been pursued, to my +knowledge. + +As well, there are countries free of software patents on every +continent, in the event that problems arise. +So hosting patent-affected software seems to be a non-issue for mirrors. + +><i> - for using it. +</I> +It doesn't seem that any individual user has been pursued for using +unauthorised patent-affected software. +So using patent-affected software is a non-issue for users. +(Unless they choose to avoid such software, of course.) + +><i> (please don't go "but there _are_ software patents" for now) +</I>(But such arguments are "so much fun" ;) ) + +><i> Romain +</I> +- André + +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001695.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001687.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1694">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1694">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1694">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1694">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |