summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001653.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001653.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001653.html107
1 files changed, 107 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001653.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001653.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..82e4e0548
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001653.html
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%20Mirror%20layout%20%3A%20Why%20validate%20software%20patents%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CFF1486.3000302%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001652.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001654.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ?</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%20Mirror%20layout%20%3A%20Why%20validate%20software%20patents%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CFF1486.3000302%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ?">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Dec 8 06:15:50 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001652.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001654.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1653">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1653">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1653">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1653">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>We have a proposal to add an optional set of respositories for packages
+subject to software patents - or at least, seem to be at risk of civil
+pursuits in some countries, based on supposed violation of software patents.
+
+As we know, the suggested name for these repositories is &quot;tainted&quot;.
+Some suggested that a negative name would denigrate the quality of the
+software contained, so another name should be chosen. Myself included.
+
+Then some bright individual suggested that this was equivalent to
+debating the colour to paint a bike shed.
+
+Which got me thinking.
+
+Suppose some company claimed a patent against the rpm data format.
+(Presumably targeting RedHat.)
+So we transfer all rpm-related programs (rpdrake, urpmi, etc) into the
+&quot;tainted&quot; repository.
+
+But wait a minute !
+
+By presenting a special set of repositories for patent-affected
+software, we could be seen as justifying these patent sharks.
+In their minds, why else would be accommodate them ?
+
+Ok, I think, how many other distros have such repositories. According
+to comments on the list : none.
+So why are we breaking this ground for the patent sharks ?
+How many distros have been sued for patent violation ?
+Besides the SCO/Novell fiasco, it seems none.
+How many distro mirror sites have been affected by carrying
+patent-threatened software ?
+To my knowledge : none.
+And what happens if there is a patent pursuit against Mageia or it's
+mirrors ?
+Even if we have a separate repository, the package in question might end
+up being withdrawn. But it seems doubtful that one would want to
+withdraw all potentially threatened packages.
+(That would be a big victory for patent sharks.)
+
+Thinking further, what reaction have we from potential mirror sites ?
+One such site administrator expressed opposition to the extra complexity
+of the optional nature of these repositories.
+No report of anyone wanting to have an official mirror, that wanted such
+repositories.
+So we don't seem to have any practical reason to have such a repository.
+
+So the question remains : Why validate software patents ?
+
+Something to consider.
+
+- Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001652.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001654.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1653">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1653">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1653">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1653">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>