summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101128/001472.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101128/001472.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101128/001472.html146
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101128/001472.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101128/001472.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..17840abae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101128/001472.html
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101128175028.GA5698%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001473.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
+ <B>Michael scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101128175028.GA5698%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Nov 28 18:50:28 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001473.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1472">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1472">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1472">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1472">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:16:57PM +0100, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+&gt;<i> Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 22:07:43 schreef Michael scherer:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:23:59PM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Jerome Quelin skrev 27.11.2010 19:11:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt;On 10/11/27 17:59 +0100, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt;and, more importantly: what is the advantage? that is, what does that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt;bring you, except more admin?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; QA!
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; and enduser satisfaction.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Just take a look on many bugreports in MDV Bugzilla.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; If the report is against a nomaintainer@ package, currently Triage
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; pretty much only can state &quot;thanks for your report, but since it has
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; no maintainer, nothing will probably happend&quot; wich is not good answer
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; for a person that have taken the time to report a bug.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Then why don't we either :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - decide that non maintened package must be taken care by trainee, as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; part of the training
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - decide to clean them.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> that's a great idea, we need more trainees! but of course, we can't do that
+</I>&gt;<i> with all 5000+ unmaintained packages...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> is there a way to get rpm usage stats from those unmaintained packages.
+</I>
+No. We can only get download stats from mirrors. While it may be biased toward
+some geographical preference ( ie, I doubt many people download locale-zh
+from distrib-coffee ), it can give at least some ideas. Nothing precise, but
+still better than random.
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; By having the /extra/ disabled by default, and a popup notifying the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; user if he enables it that the packages are &quot;unmaintained&quot; he knows
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; he's &quot;on his own&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; That's already what the GPL say, basically :)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; ( you have no garantee of anything ).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Yet, I fail to see what benefit it does really bring to users. Most of them
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; will enable the media ( because some people enable everything ), will
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; forget the message ( because we always forget popup, thanks
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; to endless abuse of such popup ),
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; and the only benefit is that we could tell &quot;we told you&quot;. Not really
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; satisfying, and if I was a user, it would not really please me, nor
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; inspire confidence.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> some would, but that they'd also enable testing, backports, debug, etc... if
+</I>&gt;<i> they really do so, it's kind of their own fault. i don't think the majority
+</I>&gt;<i> does that. the majority leaves it at default.
+</I>
+And so the majority will say &quot;$distro is bad because there is not enough software&quot;.
+
+&gt;<i> The thing is that you have no guarantee, but the thing is, with mdv, there's
+</I>&gt;<i> too much packages that just don't work; you install it, you click in the menu
+</I>&gt;<i> and nothing happens because it doesn't work.
+</I>
+So too much is 10%, more ?
+
+&gt;<i> same thing and one of them is in extra; then i get only one, if i can't find
+</I>&gt;<i> any, i can enable the searching in extra and try to find a package that works.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> that's why i personally would prefer to leave these off by default.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; We could avoid adding a media by merging this media with core,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; and show the popup when a user install a package without maintainer,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; telling either &quot;beware, this package is currently marked as not maintained,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; and may be buggy. We will try to do what we can to help in this case, but
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; no one is officialy in charge&quot; or &quot;we are seeking help on taking care of
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; this package, if you use it often, please register on $URL&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> this popup will get ignored too; and persons who are perfectly aware of it,
+</I>&gt;<i> will grow irritated.
+</I>
+Then, we can do a single &quot;do not ask me again&quot;, or just show it once ?
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> futhermore: (no separate extra)
+</I>&gt;<i> - huge amount of packages (think of the mirrors)
+</I>
+mirror space is taken with extra or core. So the argument do not stand much.
+Now, this would be a arguent for simply erasing those unmaintained packages.
+
+&gt;<i> - huge hdlists
+</I>
+Indeed. But if we want to have people be able to search
+inside like you said you would, this would still be downloaded, be used ( so in memory )
+and on the mirror. So that's also not much a good reason.
+( however, if we remove them... )
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001473.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1472">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1472">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1472">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1472">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>