summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101127/001453.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101127/001453.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101127/001453.html105
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101127/001453.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101127/001453.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..05bec7d40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101127/001453.html
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101127090353.GF15726%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001446.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001457.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
+ <B>Michael scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101127090353.GF15726%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Nov 27 10:03:53 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001446.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001457.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1453">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1453">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1453">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1453">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:51:59AM +0100, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
+&gt;<i> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 00:44, Maarten Vanraes
+</I>&gt;<i> &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:25:17 schreef Thomas Backlund:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; [...]
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; A) i see no reason for codecs and firmware to be separate. However, i do
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; understand that some people would not want to install firmware, but i
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; think we should do this in another way, (like installing a meta package
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; that enforces some limits.)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; codecs seem odd to be separate, if they have patented problems they
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; should go in non_free, if no problem, they can go in core.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; That is doable.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; The reason for having it separate was because its the most &quot;problematic&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; one. (codecs have more issues than firmware)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; What i meant here, is why is firmware separate from core? why is codecs
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; separate from core?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; imo, i would put firmware and codecs in either core or non_free.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I guess we should separate concerns?
+</I>&gt;<i> - non_free as in &quot;not (really) free software&quot; (source code may be
+</I>&gt;<i> available, but license, redistribution conditions, etc.)
+</I>&gt;<i> - problematic stuff as in &quot;binary closed thing&quot; (most firmware, but
+</I>&gt;<i> not only eventually)
+</I>
+Well, &quot;binary closed thing&quot; mean &quot;source code may be available, but not for anybody
+outside the company&quot;. It look like a lot like &quot;source code may be
+available, but license, redistribution conditions&quot; , with redistribution conditions
+mean &quot;no unless you are the shareholder board&quot; .
+So they are the same thing, ie non_free.
+
+&gt;<i> - problematic stuff as in &quot;(likely) patented&quot; (some codecs)
+</I>
+Patented and likely enforced. There is some patents on WebM, since google bought
+ON2, but they gave a patent promise. The same could go for invalid patents, where there
+is clear prior art, like <A HREF="http://jan.wildeboer.net/2010/11/patent-madness-by-tandberg/">http://jan.wildeboer.net/2010/11/patent-madness-by-tandberg/</A> .
+
+We could also speak of Java, and the claims from Oracle (
+<A HREF="http://www.betanews.com/article/This-is-big-Oracle-claims-Android-violates-its-Java-patents-sues-Google/1281675545">http://www.betanews.com/article/This-is-big-Oracle-claims-Android-violates-its-Java-patents-sues-Google/1281675545</A> ),
+which would be quite broad, <A HREF="http://www.google.com/patents?id=dyQGAAAAEBAJ">http://www.google.com/patents?id=dyQGAAAAEBAJ</A> for example seems either invalid, or very similar
+to selinux and traditional unix permissions, the sae goes for <A HREF="http://www.google.com/patents?id=G1YGAAAAEBAJ">http://www.google.com/patents?id=G1YGAAAAEBAJ</A> .
+
+So codecs definitly doesn't sound like the proper name if we may end putting the whole java stack there.
+( since there is patents, and since they are clearly enforced, and since openjdk is free software (=&gt; ! non_free ) ).
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001446.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001457.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1453">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1453">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1453">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1453">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>