summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001314.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001314.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001314.html204
1 files changed, 204 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001314.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001314.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9da3e4032
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001314.html
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20tree%20structure&In-Reply-To=%3C201010211716.06866.bgmilne%40multilinks.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001311.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001309.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure</H1>
+ <B>Buchan Milne</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20tree%20structure&In-Reply-To=%3C201010211716.06866.bgmilne%40multilinks.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure">bgmilne at multilinks.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Oct 21 18:16:06 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001311.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001309.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1314">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1314">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1314">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1314">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Thursday, 21 October 2010 06:37:37 Olivier Thauvin wrote:
+&gt;<i> * J.A. Magall&#243;n (<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">jamagallon at ono.com</A>) wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:34:24 +0200, Olivier Thauvin
+</I>&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">nanardon at nanardon.zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Hi,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; ...
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Now come the question: &quot;what is a valid mirror ?&quot;, eg, what a mirror
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; should have as file to be valid ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Some ideas (probably silly ;)).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Why don't you split mirrors in 2 categories:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - Software (RPM) repo mirrors, available for network install or urpmi.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; (distrib+people+software).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - ISO mirrors. Avaliable for torrenting or ftp. MDV2010.1 release isos
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; are
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; about 15Gb. With 2 releases per year, thats 30Gb per year, 200 Gb on 6
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; years. Some places can just mirror this...you lower the 700Gb to 500,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; not bad.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; so mirroring can be done by version (or was this what you wanted to
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; avoid?).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes, I tried to avoid it because I perfectly know mirrors will take care
+</I>&gt;<i> to mirror new version every 6 months (ibiblio example again, nobody had
+</I>&gt;<i> a look for several years, at least since 2008).
+</I>
+This will result in fewer mirrors (those that cannot or choose not to dedicate
+~ 1TiB). I would rather consider other solutions to this problem. On my own
+mirror (which has a total of 820GB available at present), I use exclude
+options to rsync in my mirror scripts (but, I have to change these after each
+release).
+
+Maybe instead we could provide exclude-list files on the mirror, so mirror
+maintainers can use --exclude-from=/path/to/mageia/mirror_cfg/old_releases.cfg
+
+Also, in order to try and expedite getting what most users need out to mirrors
+first, I would prefer either:
+-development tree separate from releases
+-development release should be selected last by mirroring tools (e.g. follow
+alphabetically all stable releases if not separate)
+
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; BTW
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &lt;nitpickin&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - could you kill the final 's' on all the names ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; distribs -&gt; distrib
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Done
+</I>
+Maybe 'releases' or 'release' instead?
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; iso (you didnt named it 'isos')
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; peoples -&gt; people
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Done
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; software (not softwares)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Is already 'software'
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - could you not mix case in names (SRPMS &lt;-&gt; x86_64), just srpms...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This part depend on BS and how this team working on it will organise the
+</I>&gt;<i> distrib. I'll suggest them.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - could be the arch names more uniform ? in my personal scripts/setups
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I use x86-32 and x86-64.
+</I>
+Is x86-32 a valid architecture for rpm etc.? While uniformity might be nice,
+unfortunately vendors don't necessarily choose uniform architecure names, and
+it might be better to match the repo structure to values that can be
+determined directly (and not heuristcally) .
+
+I've also never seen 'uname -m' report x86-32 or x86_32.
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; Moreover, perhaps in a not so near future some
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; adventurous soul builds Mageia on ARM or Sparc, so why not sort things
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; like
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; distrib/cauldron/srpm
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; distrib/cauldron/x86/32/iso
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; /rpm
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; /64
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; /arm/32
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; /64
+</I>
+I don't know if memory address space is a useful differentiator here, as
+features differ substantially in different ARM cores of the same family or
+architecture version. E.g., Fedora has an 'armv5tel' architecture, N900 ships
+.deb's with 'armel' as the architecture. See
+<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture</A>
+
+&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; /sparc/32
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; /64
+</I>
+AFAIK, the valid architecture names for sparc are sparc,sparc64,sparcv9.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This depend again on BS part.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; The drawback is that ISOs are in the same tree so no separate mirroring
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; is possible, but I think you didn't want this anyways.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I'll take care to this.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; All this renaming in case it is not some kind of standard for tree layout
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; or the like...
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &lt;/nitpickin&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Just my 2&#8364;cent, you will judge...
+</I>
+The readme file mentions that mirrors must sync every 2 hours. For tier1
+mirrors, I would agree, however you may need to stagger sync intervals to
+lower tiers (e.g. 4 hours at tier2 and 12 hours at tier3).
+
+It may be worthwhile to try and estimate the actual rsync bandwidth that must
+be achieved to make a specific tier.
+
+(I am not able to sync every 2 hours, probably not 4, maybe 12, though my
+mirror currently syncs daily - for Mandriva I could sync 'official' more
+regularly, but not 'devel').
+
+
+Regards,
+Buchan
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001311.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001309.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1314">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1314">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1314">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1314">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>