summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001309.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001309.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001309.html141
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001309.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001309.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bae552989
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101021/001309.html
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CBFA9E6.2050109%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001314.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001310.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
+ <B>andr&#233;</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CBFA9E6.2050109%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Oct 21 04:48:06 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001314.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001310.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1309">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1309">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1309">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1309">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Tux99 a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Quote: Ahmad Samir wrote on Thu, 14 October 2010 16:00
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I've seen, too many times, trigger-happy packagers backporting
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> packages that're not maintained by them (so they know it less than
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> those package maintainer(s)), breaking those packages and annoying the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> maintainers of said packages. It's usually irresponsible to backport a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> package without taking that package maintainer's opinion into account.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (an infamous example on that is gwibber being backported to 2010.1).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I agree it should be preferably the maintainer doing the backport, or he
+</I>&gt;<i> should at least be consulted.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>I think that should be an explicit policy of Mageia.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> New users who frequented the forums always got to know what backports
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> are pretty fast. And bugzilla is the perfect system for asking for a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backport, that worked pretty good.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The wast majority of 'normal' users never uses the forum.
+</I>&gt;<i> Backports shouldn't be something that only users who frequent the forum
+</I>&gt;<i> find out about.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>True. Although I suspect that they are more likely to use the forum
+than formally make a bug report.
+&gt;&gt;<i> That's they way backports has always worked, no specific patches, just
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the latest cooker package pushed to backports &quot;as is with no official
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> support&quot;, that's reasonable, packagers shouldn't promise to support
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backports when they can't due to various reasons (time, effort.. etc).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But IMHO that should change in Mageia, we should promise support by the way
+</I>&gt;<i> of timely updates, especially when security issues are present.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>That can only change if we have more ressources. At least at first, we
+risk to have somewhat less, without the financial input from the
+commercial side that exists for Mandriva.
+&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Backports shouldn't be second choice, it should be the default,
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> since that
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> would make Mageia stand out from other distros as being the distro
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> were
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> users get the latest versions of apps before any other major
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> distro
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> provides them.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Enabling them by default defies the purpose of having backports at
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> all; it's not for new users, it's more for slightly experienced users
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> or power users who want the latest versions of apps.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>Agreed.
+&gt;<i> That's exactly the crucial bit that IMHO needs to change, backports are
+</I>&gt;<i> very interesting for 'normal' users so we should make sure normal users
+</I>&gt;<i> can use them.
+</I>&gt;<i> Don't you see how attractive it is especially for 'normal' users to have
+</I>&gt;<i> access to the latest versions all the time?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>I would expect that 'normal' users would be most concerned that the
+system just work.
+The 'latest versions' is more a preoccupation of a minority of at least
+moderately experienced users, who probably also like trying out all
+sorts of new software.
+Not at all typical of the population in general, but admittedly more
+common among Linux users.
+
+&gt;<i> Sure, not everyone wants them, but by integrating the skip.list in the
+</I>&gt;<i> update GUI we could keep 'conservative' users happy too
+</I>That would certainly help, and not just for 'conservative' users. Often
+a particular package only has problems on some systems. A more readily
+accessible skip.list blacklist would make it easier to avoid accidently
+re-installing a package that didn't work as expected the first time, for
+whatever reason.
+
+- Andr&#233; (andre999)
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001314.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001310.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1309">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1309">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1309">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1309">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>