diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101011/001076.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101011/001076.html | 123 |
1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101011/001076.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101011/001076.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..47525c3e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101011/001076.html @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTika7V_kY6ZymxpL72z0gsD%3DmUWnYB8ZMvxMYGzn%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001075.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001077.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1> + <B>vfmBOFH</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTika7V_kY6ZymxpL72z0gsD%3DmUWnYB8ZMvxMYGzn%40mail.gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">vfmbofh at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Mon Oct 11 17:27:41 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001075.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycle - what is actually POSSIBLE? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001077.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1076">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1076">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1076">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1076">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>2010/10/6 vfmBOFH <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">vfmbofh at gmail.com</A>> + +><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> 2010/10/1 atilla ontas <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>> +</I>><i> +</I>>><i> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every +</I>>><i> 6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should +</I>>><i> make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't +</I>>><i> be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like +</I>>><i> systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a +</I>>><i> year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors +</I>>><i> space waste. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do +</I>>><i> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and +</I>>><i> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using +</I>>><i> code names. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> What's your opinion? +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Hi all. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community what +</I>><i> kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the +</I>><i> weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community +</I>><i> preferences. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be +</I>><i> stay in touch about their preferences. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Cheers +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>Hi all again. + +As i said, there's the results of the poll published in Blogdrake: + +58% of votes are for maintain the same mandriva's release cycle scheme (same +scheme, not parallel releases) There are several opinions about the +periodicity of the releases: six months, eight months, annual... all options +are more or less the same level of preference. + +24% has chosen the "Rolling-light" model. as in the traditional model, there +are opinions that support the annual release, six months or eight months. +But this option, is dominated by the annual release of the "core". + +15% supports the "pure-Rolling" model. There's nothing to say about release +dates. + +Surprisingly, there is also a minority support to a model similar to the +"Debian way". I must confess that this last option on the poll was started +as a joke, because Blogdrake's members often suffer "versionitis". But there +are the votes (3%)... + +So, these are the results of the survey. Apparently, the Blogdrake's +community is closer to a model "release + backports". + +I think it should be noted (as far as possible) the preferences of the +community, in addition to technical and logistical constraints. Maybe with +similar polls in other local communities? + +Cheers. +-------------- next part -------------- +An HTML attachment was scrubbed... +URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment.html> +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001075.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycle - what is actually POSSIBLE? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001077.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1076">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1076">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1076">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1076">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |