diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101008/001033.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101008/001033.html | 102 |
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101008/001033.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101008/001033.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1062558ed --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101008/001033.html @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post) + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%3A%20Updating%20released%20versions%20%28long%20post%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4CAF5C7C.5000605%40roadrunner.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001026.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001044.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post)</H1> + <B>Frank Griffin</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%3A%20Updating%20released%20versions%20%28long%20post%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4CAF5C7C.5000605%40roadrunner.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post)">ftg at roadrunner.com + </A><BR> + <I>Fri Oct 8 20:01:32 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001026.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001044.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1033">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1033">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1033">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1033">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Luca Berra wrote: +><i> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:49:29PM -0400, Frank Griffin wrote: +</I>>><i> I'd like to propose the following model for updating released versions: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> 1) Users should not have to see, except in minor ways, the different +</I>>><i> repositories. Urpmi may see them, and advanced or ideologically polar +</I>>><i> users may care about them (e.g. free vs non-free), but most users +</I>><i> I object to this specific point, if what we are doing is free software +</I>><i> that should be made clear to users. and i believe the user shold be +</I>><i> asked wether they want to use only free software or not. +</I> +I have no objection to allowing users to check a box saying they want +free or mixed systems. I just don't want them to have to mess with a +repository to do it. + +><i> I just read it 3 times, and i still believe doing the above might +</I>><i> prove to be a +</I>><i> nightmare. +</I>><i> rolling back a single, well identified change is a doable task. +</I>><i> rolling back proceduraly a complex change becomes exponentially complex +</I>><i> even for experienced system engineers, let alone a piece of software. +</I> +I agree that the work becomes exponentially complex, but not the concept +of what has to be done. After all, what can be installed in an +automated way can be uninstalled. + +In any case, I would think that the primary use of this facility would +be to uninstall a single package. Urpme already knows how to do that, +and (provided you have the older RPM around) urpmi knows how to install +the old one. We expect users who want to roll back a package to do that +manually today. + +The problem is that removing the new package, if it provides something +that lots of things require, will want to uninstall a large number of +packages uselessly, because it doesn't know that you're about to turn +around and install something else that provides it. All I'm suggesting +is that + (a) we make the older RPMs available somewhere + (b) we automate the process to save three manual steps, and + (c) we wrap them in an atomic transaction (or what looks like one to +the user) to solve the problem above +</PRE> + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001026.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001044.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal: Updating released versions (long post) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1033">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1033">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1033">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1033">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |