diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000921.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000921.html | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000921.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000921.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d837111d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000921.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTinv1nQv%2BUXLjyBQxcs2r0DV3zBJUDgA0OfCZD8c%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000920.html"> + + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1> + <B>vfmBOFH</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTinv1nQv%2BUXLjyBQxcs2r0DV3zBJUDgA0OfCZD8c%40mail.gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">vfmbofh at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Wed Oct 6 23:10:20 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000920.html">[Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets +</A></li> + + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#921">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#921">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#921">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#921">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>2010/10/1 atilla ontas <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>> + +><i> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every +</I>><i> 6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should +</I>><i> make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't +</I>><i> be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like +</I>><i> systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a +</I>><i> year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors +</I>><i> space waste. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do +</I>><i> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and +</I>><i> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using +</I>><i> code names. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> What's your opinion? +</I>><i> +</I> +Hi all. + +At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community what +kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the +weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community +preferences. + +We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be +stay in touch about their preferences. + +Cheers +-------------- next part -------------- +An HTML attachment was scrubbed... +URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment-0001.html> +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000920.html">[Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets +</A></li> + + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#921">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#921">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#921">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#921">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |