summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20100927/000312.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20100927/000312.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20100927/000312.html197
1 files changed, 197 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20100927/000312.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20100927/000312.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..60f8539b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20100927/000312.html
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20A%20comparison%20of%20forum%20software%20from%20a%20security%20POV&In-Reply-To=%3C4CA0B80B.9070702%40vilarem.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000297.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000320.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV</H1>
+ <B>Ma&#226;t</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20A%20comparison%20of%20forum%20software%20from%20a%20security%20POV&In-Reply-To=%3C4CA0B80B.9070702%40vilarem.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV">maat-ml at vilarem.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Sep 27 17:28:11 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000297.html">[Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000320.html">[Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#312">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#312">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#312">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#312">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le 27/09/2010 10:02, Romain d'Alverny a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Hi,
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:19, Tux99 &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tux99-mga at uridium.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I did a quick comparison of the most common forum software packages
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (both commercial and FOSS) from a vulnerability point of view.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I'm subscribed to the well known (every sysadmin that takes his/her job
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> seriously is subscribed to it) weekly SANS &quot;@RISK: The Consensus
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Security Alert&quot; newsletter since 2000, so I have an mbox archive file
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> that contains almost 11 years worth of weekly alerts of software
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> vulnerabilities.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> A quick an easy way that I have used before to assess the vulnerability
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> of any software is to do a simple grep of the software name in this mbox
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> file and count the times that software gets mentioned. While this is not
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 100% scientific it gives a good approximation of the amount of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> vulnerabilities a particular software has suffered from.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Indeed. It's interesting. But ranking only by the disclosed number of
+</I>&gt;<i> vulnerabilities in the past does not assess what will be in the
+</I>&gt;<i> future. It's not enough.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> What would be an additional important figure is, how long has it been
+</I>&gt;<i> for each vulnerability to be fixed; how many users each has had, etc.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Plus, what type of vulnerability. Plus, for what branch of the
+</I>&gt;<i> software (I guess, for instance, phpBB 2.x and 3.x are a bit
+</I>&gt;<i> different).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>Hi,
+
+phpbb2 and phpbb3 share very few lines of code afaik
+
+And statistics are enough to explain :
+
+phpBB2: 38 advisories (27 vuln) 0% unpatched
+<A HREF="http://secunia.com/advisories/product/463/">http://secunia.com/advisories/product/463/</A>
+
+9% highly critical, 34% moderate, 49% low, 9% not
+
+phpBB2 is/was a well known security nightmare :o)
+
+----
+
+fudForum: 2 advisories (2 vuln) 0% unpatched
+<A HREF="http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5530/">http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5530/</A>
+
+50% highly critical, 50% moderate
+
+The critical one allowing system access :o)
+
+----
+
+phpBB3: 4 advisories (5 vuln) 0% unpatched
+<A HREF="http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17998/">http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17998/</A>
+
+0% highly critical, 25 % moderate, 75% low
+
+----
+
+I crearly consider phpBB3 not less secure than fudForum can be :)
+
+
+&gt;<i> What we do need is a forum that matches our needs; actually pretty
+</I>&gt;<i> basic, but maybe for having good admin features, excellent
+</I>&gt;<i> hackability, extensability, being well documented, having a nice
+</I>&gt;<i> community of developers around it. And, provided we're in the free
+</I>&gt;<i> software thing, we want to be able to share changes as well (would it
+</I>&gt;<i> be only through our own community) without worrying.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So, requirement #1: open source license (as in <A HREF="http://opensource.org/">http://opensource.org/</A> ).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> [...]
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Romain
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>when it comes to forum engine choice there are many things important to
+consider (in particular if we are optimistic enough to consider it could
+grow with Mageia future success).
+
+Security is one of them.
+
+If the forum is supposed to grow we must have something properly working
+under rather high load... than can involve a separate server for
+database (or even something stronger) that can also involve a forum
+engine that proved it's ability to survive high loads (and the biggest
+in <A HREF="http://www.big-boards.com">http://www.big-boards.com</A> runs phpBB3).
+
+Very *very* important if we want to be able to deal with trolls and
+forum users experience : we must have moderation needs being well
+addressed (global topic management with topics splitting and merging,
+easy messages management (editing, suppressing, moving... hiding ?),
+easy user management including things like temporary moderation of
+messages to calm down trolls and other useful thing like detection of
+multiple accounts creation, temporary or definitive banishment, ability
+to give extended rights to &quot;special&quot; people (dev, bug squad, doc
+writers, technical support...)
+
+If we want to provide a good user experience we must have something that
+provide a templating system easy to understand and to play with.
+
+Then there are administration features (bot management, forum structure,
+fine grained access control and tuning)
+
+And obviously hackability is important to allow things like SSO and
+other cool things (perhaps nice RSS features ? Mailing Lists connection
+? Button available to Technical support team and moderators allowing to
+send an alert on Cauldron list if a post can be interresting for devs ?
+Bugzilla connection ?)
+
+Something very secure that cannot do the job or that will make
+moderators life a hell and user experience a pain is not the ideal forum
+engine imho
+
+All this parameters (and others less important) need to be taken in
+account and the first people whom i would listen to are future
+administrators and moderators... because they will suffer with it every
+day... and beacause the quality of their work and attitude toward forum
+users will be the first thing likely to attract people and give a good
+reputation to Mageia community :)
+
+my2cents
+
+Ma&#226;t
+
+
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20100927/e7007c74/attachment.html&gt;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000297.html">[Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000320.html">[Mageia-dev] A comparison of forum software from a security POV
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#312">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#312">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#312">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#312">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>