1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-bugsquad/attachments/20121101/b055b2a7/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-bugsquad/attachments/20121101/b055b2a7/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9b2966619
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-bugsquad/attachments/20121101/b055b2a7/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+<html>
+  <head>
+    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
+      http-equiv="Content-Type">
+  </head>
+  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
+    Le 01/11/2012 08:34, Marja van Waes a &eacute;crit&nbsp;:
+    <blockquote cite="mid:50922614.30600@xs4all.nl" type="cite">
+      <pre wrap="">Hi everyone,
+
+Before I start going over old NEEDINFO bugs again:
+
+According to the triage guide, incomplete bugs should, if the
+requested info isn't supplied, be closed as INVALID.
+
+I don't see anything about originally <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>valid<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> bugs, where later
+additional information was requested (e.g. because it was filed
+against cauldron and cauldron changed a lot, or because the involved
+package was updated).
+
+I did close those as OLD if the reporter didn't reply. Was that good
+to do in the first place?
+
+If it was good: I'm now wondering how I can keep myself from
+accidentally closing reports that have <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>never<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> been valid, as OLD
+instead of as INVALID, if I don't take a lot more time to read the
+reports :/
+
+Cheers,
+Marja</pre>
+    </blockquote>
+    <br>
+    Well the triage guide was originally copy-paste from mdv, so we can
+    do whatever we want too.<br>
+    And beside for ours stats, or angry users, I guess make it simple
+    without detailing doesn't shock anyone.<br>
+    <br>
+    <br>
+    &nbsp; <br>
+  </body>
+</html>