summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html202
1 files changed, 202 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..45b4cae52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004333.html
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5Bforums-discuss%5D%20Re%3A%20updating%20sysadmin%0A%20privileges%20in%20forum%20config&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj5KG3sDFmqDAmuv%3D8h7NnfdUqEh0duM5ZWxnJJBeUvX9w%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="004332.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="004288.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config</H1>
+ <B>Wolfgang Bornath</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5Bforums-discuss%5D%20Re%3A%20updating%20sysadmin%0A%20privileges%20in%20forum%20config&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj5KG3sDFmqDAmuv%3D8h7NnfdUqEh0duM5ZWxnJJBeUvX9w%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config">molch.b at googlemail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Mar 27 10:16:00 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004332.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004288.html">[Mageia-sysadm] updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4333">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4333">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4333">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4333">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>First let me express my appreciation for putting so much time into
+explanations of points I now understand more clearly than before.
+
+2012/3/26 Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt;:
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> For example :
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/phpbb/templates/config.php?revision=1625&amp;view=markup">http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/phpbb/templates/config.php?revision=1625&amp;view=markup</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> that's config.php. Anyone knowing php ( or asp, or jsp ) would
+</I>&gt;<i> intuitively understand the format ( ie, database is a variable given
+</I>&gt;<i> somewhere else )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The git checkout url is in another file, to get it :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> git clone <A HREF="git://git.mageia.org/forum/">git://git.mageia.org/forum/</A> foo
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> and we just remove &quot;phpBB/install&quot; after checkout.
+</I>
+Yes, that is a must after installation, forum software checks for that.
+
+&gt;<i> When I mean &quot;being up to date&quot;, i mean using the same tool we use for
+</I>&gt;<i> others packages to know there is a update, etc.
+</I>&gt;<i> IE, having the package up to date. The same goes for &quot;quality&quot;. Web
+</I>&gt;<i> developpers tend to focus on the use case of &quot;I have a shared space and
+</I>&gt;<i> I cannot change nything to it&quot;, which is not our case. We can change
+</I>&gt;<i> apache config, we can put some stuff outside of the web root, etc.
+</I>
+When we (mandrivauser.de) set up phpBB (and later phpBB3) we used
+Mandriva as server os and there was not much to change in apache
+(forum related), I remember we had to change one setting in php.ini,
+that was all. In fact we had (still have now on Debian) a similar
+setup, except that we installed phpBB directly without git.
+
+&gt;<i> But that's a difficult problem to solve, and in the mean term, we should
+</I>&gt;<i> have a solution, and I think therefor sticking to stock software is the
+</I>&gt;<i> best compromise. I am aware that some mod would make stuff better ( for
+</I>&gt;<i> example, to have a decent url, helping for visibility, etc ) and i am
+</I>&gt;<i> sure that they are all enhancing the forum ( I mean, no one will do a
+</I>&gt;<i> mod to make it worst ), but they are not free in term of ressources to
+</I>&gt;<i> integrate.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So that's a tradeoff. It is better, but then you have to do some work
+</I>&gt;<i> for each upgrade, etc.
+</I>
+Yes. But as I see in the forum, requests for changes are almost all in
+the /styles section, that are not MODs, just changing of lines in the
+templates. So no security related software involved. Examples: moving
+or adding a line with a link, etc. or another icon set. Of course this
+has to be documented because it has to be changed at each update.
+
+&gt;<i> Now we decided to use phpbb, I guess we will stick to it. A migration
+</I>&gt;<i> would take too much time, and despites having a setup that can be
+</I>&gt;<i> improved ( to my eyes ), it seems to do the job.
+</I>
+Yes.
+
+&gt;<i> But the point is still valid, &#160;if people wish to help or think they can
+</I>&gt;<i> do a better job than us ( and I think we are not perfect, I do not deny
+</I>&gt;<i> ), we can arrange something.
+</I>
+No, through all these discussions (here and in the forum
+(unfortunately I have the time to read both)) I never had the
+impression that somebody wrote he could do better than your team.
+
+&gt;<i> Part of the problem is first what do people mean by &quot;admin&quot;.
+</I>
+Yes. I explained that several times but I realize that this was
+probably only in forum discussions.
+
+&gt;<i> To me, this mean &quot;system admin&quot;, and even if I tried to use sysadmin for
+</I>&gt;<i> that meaning, I am sure that I have slipped more than once.
+</I>&gt;<i> And while it may not have been obvious, I only speak of the sysadmin
+</I>&gt;<i> side of the thing.
+</I>
+Yes. OTOH I (and others) never meant &quot;sysadmin&quot; with &quot;admin&quot;. A
+sysadmin is an admin for a special purpose, that's why he has those 3
+extra letters (sys) in the name. A forum-admin also has a special
+purpose, that's why he has &quot;forum-&quot; in his name. So &quot;admin&quot; is a
+rather generic term which can mean anything. To know what kind of
+admin is meant you need to add the prefix or extra letters.
+
+&gt;<i> From what I remember :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> - there is mga-sysadmin group, 10 person, who ( for the forum ) :
+</I>&gt;<i> &#160;- access the server, databases and can commit to puppet or modify
+</I>&gt;<i> directly the db, and grant access to git
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> - there is the mga-forum_developer group, of 3 person ( now 2 ), who :
+</I>&gt;<i> &#160;- have write access to the code of phpbb hosted in our git ( see url
+</I>&gt;<i> before )
+</I>&gt;<i> &#160;- should have enough access to upgrade the forum ( but do not know )
+</I>
+&gt;<i> the deployment is planned to be automatised, but that's not done ( my
+</I>&gt;<i> point was that sysadmin will do it by hand until sufficiently annoyed,
+</I>&gt;<i> and until the know how to automate it, until then we have to do the
+</I>&gt;<i> upgrade by hand to see what need to be coded, or wait for a patch for
+</I>&gt;<i> that ). I cannot speak for the others, but I do not plan to blindly code
+</I>&gt;<i> without doing a few test runs so without request to upgrade forum.
+</I>
+Just to give you an idea how much has changed so far I posted an url
+of the changelogs (more than 150 bug fixes) a little earlier in this
+thread. The update can be done automatically, but only in a custom
+setup with a custom forum. If you have only changed templates you can
+do it as well automatically but you have to repeat the template
+changes ion the new version. If you have implemented MODs or otherwise
+changed the code you have to do the updates manually which normally
+takes me (roughly) 2 work days, but I am a slow worker :).
+You get a set of &quot;changed files&quot; and normally you just copy them over
+the old files. If you changed something in those files (and had it
+documented!) then you have to do the same change in the new file. And
+you can not update from n to n+2, you have to go from n to n+1 to n+2.
+
+Then you start testing, no matter which setup you have. When I do
+changes or an update I do it locally first for testing, later on the
+server. This is about code changes or updates, it's not so hard.
+
+But what about changes in the template? Most requests of forum users
+involve only templates (like moving or adding a forum line with a
+link). These changes can be done (and have already been done in the
+Mageia forums) by the forum admin in the ACP without involving git or
+sysadmins or mga-forum_developers. Hopefully those are documented.
+
+&gt;<i> on the side of forum management, well, I do not know. That's the part
+</I>&gt;<i> where someone step in and complete my mail.
+</I>
+Well, in a forum we only need 2 kinds of &quot;admins&quot;:
+ - the forum admin who is visible in the forum, participates in
+discussions, a contact for users in case of requests or complaints, a
+contact in case of issues between users (if the Global Moderators are
+not able to solve it). Here in fact it is the human social and
+communicative side which is more important than technical knowledge.
+He is the &quot;team leader&quot; of the moderators, doing organisational things
+in the forum (like changing settings in the ACP). That is the
+important position which was not filled most of the time up to now.
+ - the technical forum admin. Somebody with phpbb knowledge who can
+work with mga-forum_developer_group and/or sysadmin team to do code
+changes and updates. He is in close contact with &quot;forum admin&quot; who
+forwards requests of forum users or issues of technical nature
+occuring in the daily life of the forum to him. He is the &quot;bridge&quot; to
+sysadmin group. Of course this can be somebody of the sysadmin group
+or forum_devels as well. He must not be present or communicative in
+the forum.
+
+OTOH these 2 positions can be filled by one person as well but both
+are equally important.
+
+--
+wobo
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004332.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004288.html">[Mageia-sysadm] updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4333">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4333">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4333">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4333">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>