summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment-0001.html19
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment.html19
2 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e37000695
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 18:30, Samuel Verschelde <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:stormi@laposte.net">stormi@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
+
+Of course yes, silly question !<br>
+<br>
+But how many use the kernel from the Core Updates Testing media ? It&#39;s an<br>
+update candidate (bugfix + security), and we would like to have it tested<br>
+<br>
+Just install it, reboot, check that there is no regression in your hardware<br>
+handling, and give us feedback on the bug report !<br>
+<br>
+If something goes well, no problem, you can still choose an older kernel from<br>
+the boot menu and report the problems you had in the bug report.<br>
+<br>
+The bug report: <a href="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642" target="_blank">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642</a><br>
+<br></blockquote><div><br>Alternatively, I&#39;d suggest using the same approach as Arch folks are doing - the one who installs the update candidate package, and it works for him, just replies with a:<br>Signed-Off for $ARCH<br>
+
+<br>(E.g., Signed-Off for i686; or Signed-Off for x86_64 - to indicate what architecture the update was tested on).<br><br>Not sure if this will spam the list a lot, but those are mine $0.02.. :) <br clear="all"></div></div>
+
+<br>-- <br>Eugeni Dodonov<a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank"><br></a><br>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e37000695
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110912/68985db6/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 18:30, Samuel Verschelde <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:stormi@laposte.net">stormi@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
+
+Of course yes, silly question !<br>
+<br>
+But how many use the kernel from the Core Updates Testing media ? It&#39;s an<br>
+update candidate (bugfix + security), and we would like to have it tested<br>
+<br>
+Just install it, reboot, check that there is no regression in your hardware<br>
+handling, and give us feedback on the bug report !<br>
+<br>
+If something goes well, no problem, you can still choose an older kernel from<br>
+the boot menu and report the problems you had in the bug report.<br>
+<br>
+The bug report: <a href="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642" target="_blank">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642</a><br>
+<br></blockquote><div><br>Alternatively, I&#39;d suggest using the same approach as Arch folks are doing - the one who installs the update candidate package, and it works for him, just replies with a:<br>Signed-Off for $ARCH<br>
+
+<br>(E.g., Signed-Off for i686; or Signed-Off for x86_64 - to indicate what architecture the update was tested on).<br><br>Not sure if this will spam the list a lot, but those are mine $0.02.. :) <br clear="all"></div></div>
+
+<br>-- <br>Eugeni Dodonov<a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank"><br></a><br>