summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html125
1 files changed, 125 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..98c26c04f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2013-April/009399.html
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mailing%20list%20migration%3A%20this%20list%20is%20closing&In-Reply-To=%3C516286FF.10308%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009397.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009403.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mailing%20list%20migration%3A%20this%20list%20is%20closing&In-Reply-To=%3C516286FF.10308%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing">andre999mga at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Apr 8 10:59:43 CEST 2013</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009397.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009403.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9399">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9399">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9399">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9399">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Ludovic Meyer a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 10:02:18PM -0400, andre999 wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> nicolas vigier a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> The only way currently is to create an identity account for each address
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> you want to use. We can look if it would possible to support an other
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> way to do it, but I don't know if that's possible. And of course any
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> suggestion about how sympa could be configured to manage multiple email
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> addresses with only one ldap account is welcome.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I don't know if this is easily configurable, but the online
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> documentation for sympa 6.1 has an example that seems to permit
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> filtering by multiple addresses with ldap.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> see <A HREF="http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition">http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition</A>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Their example shows both
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">salaun at cru.fr</A>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">O.salaun at cru.fr</A>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> being accepted with the same filter, whereas only the first is coded
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> as such.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> This seems to offer interesting possibilities, allowing users to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> have alternate email adresses with different prefixes of their ldap
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> adresse.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (by automatically adding * to the beginning of user ldap adresses.)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> The code could require a minimum length to minimise false positives,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and/or add the * just before @.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Would this work, and without too much effort ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The goal of having 1 unified login is to reduce ( usually in a company ) the amount
+</I>&gt;<i> of support of helpdesk, and the work of user because they need to have 1 login/password.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This also prevent login conflict, since there is 1 single place where this is resolved
+</I>&gt;<i> for uniqueness.
+</I>
+Apparently my comment wasn't clear.
+It is not related to mageia identity login, which would remain unchanged.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Your suggestion will just increase the support time due to increased complexity, and so
+</I>&gt;<i> reduce the time avaliable for the sysadmin team, since from what I see, they are in
+</I>&gt;<i> charge of the servers, and the function of support.
+</I>
+It would be a one-shot change. If it is properly commented, it
+shouldn't cause any support problems.
+It is up to sysadmin to decide if they want to do it.
+I was only reacting to the posts of solbu and boklm.
+(boklm is on the sysadmin team.)
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So if you think they have no better way to spend their time and that this is so
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;business critical&quot; to permit to have a mess regarding who said what, sure, go ahead
+</I>&gt;<i> and provides a patch. If I am not wrong, the configuration is on :
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/sympa/">http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/sympa/</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But if the only goal is to satisfy the special need of a few unique snowflakes, that's not really a
+</I>&gt;<i> good move.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>Not very clear why you are taking offense.
+We are talking about a minor change to solve a perceived need of a user.
+More significant changes are being done all the time.
+Maybe you should re-read my post ?
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009397.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009403.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9399">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9399">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9399">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9399">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>