diff options
| author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
| commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
| tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019632.html | |
| parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
| download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip | |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019632.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019632.html | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019632.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019632.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..405cd2e73 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019632.html @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj7Tt%3DGHAjM0Qs_DWvHjMHqBmjfbY9%2BDH-0%2BO3aDVTgsCQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="019628.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="019633.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue</H1> + <B>Wolfgang Bornath</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj7Tt%3DGHAjM0Qs_DWvHjMHqBmjfbY9%2BDH-0%2BO3aDVTgsCQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue">molch.b at googlemail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Oct 30 02:11:59 CET 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019628.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019633.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#19632">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#19632">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#19632">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#19632">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>2012/10/30 Olivier Blin <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">mageia at blino.org</A>>: +><i> Wolfgang Bornath <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>> writes: +</I>><i> +</I>>><i> There has been a wide consensus for the solution to put it into +</I>>><i> tainted as has been said in this thread as well. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> The consensus was maybe not so clear then. +</I> +Maybe not so clear for those whose opinion differs from the consensus, +understandable. I did not write about a consensus as first one, it has +been written repeatedly by others. + +>><i> Sorry if it is too offending for one or the other if I call this +</I>>><i> procedure "ridiculous". +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Where do you see a procedure here? :-) +</I>><i> Offer one if you think that's needed. +</I> +Ah, in case you have missed all those mails in the devel list: +1. The issue was brought to the attention of the people, including the +developers. +2. The issue has been discussed at length including mantra-like repetitions. +3. Several people suggested the same solution (we did not start a poll +but to me it looked like a large part of the participants of the +discussion). If I am wrong here then all others who saw it like me are +wrong as well +4. All it needed now was action according to that consensus. + +This is what I call a procedure and how issues have been treated many +times. May be your definition is different. + +After the discussion reached this state everybody waited for action, +which may have ver well have been delayed because of other more +important work. That was the subject/contents of the opening mail and +first answers of this thread. Until somebody started to open the +discussion again. + +Another option would have been to bring the issue to the council after +the first discussion ended but I haven't yet read any mail about such +a move during the months since then. +Is that what you were waiting for? + +><i> It could be up to the council or board to chose the lesser evil between: +</I>><i> - picking tainted for non-free + tainted packages like faac, and thus +</I>><i> forbid mirroring tainted packages that are only free-software +</I>><i> (but maybe that's the hypothetical 'selective mirror admin' from Guillaume) +</I> +yes, you've been calling those existing mirror maintainers +"hypothetical" before. Very good argument. If I don't like something I +just pretend it isn't there. + +Anyhow, I said my opinion in the first thread including the reasons +behind my opinion. The outcome of this is not so interesting (I could +use the blogdrake solution any time), I'm ok with any decision or +consensus. But it is the way this issue is handled which I criticise. + +-- +wobo +</PRE> + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019628.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019633.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#19632">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#19632">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#19632">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#19632">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |