diff options
author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019122.html | |
parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019122.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019122.html | 111 |
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019122.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019122.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4884827bd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019122.html @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj5abYwFHtqKVTk97zxjb5u8GCtgLEhBQVxFzkJUmmz1cw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="019121.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="019123.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue</H1> + <B>Wolfgang Bornath</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20rehashing%20the%20faac%20issue&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj5abYwFHtqKVTk97zxjb5u8GCtgLEhBQVxFzkJUmmz1cw%40mail.gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue">molch.b at googlemail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Oct 2 13:50:34 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019121.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019123.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#19122">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#19122">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#19122">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#19122">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>2012/10/2 Frank Griffin <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">ftg at roadrunner.com</A>>: +><i> On 10/02/2012 04:03 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Given the importance of this package for several multimedia-related +</I>>><i> software (it is a mandatory dependency for cinerella, for instance), I think +</I>>><i> it's time to revisit this decision, and rather look for a pragmatic solution +</I>>><i> rather than a merely bureaucratic one. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> I read the links, but I think the discussion would benefit from a statement +</I>><i> of exactly why people don't want nonfree software in tainted. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> At least for my part, I always viewed tainted as being the equivalent of +</I>><i> PLF, i. e. we'll put this stuff in there because it's legal where we are, +</I>><i> and you decide whether you want to mirror it and make your own decision as +</I>><i> to whether you want to use it. I thought the whole point was to segregate +</I>><i> tainted stuff from everything else so that mirror maintainers could avoid +</I>><i> tainted yet still mirror the mainstream repos. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> If that's true, and tainted is just a dumping ground for stuff that we have +</I>><i> legal or philosophical problems putting anywhere else, then I don't get the +</I>><i> free/nonfree issue. +</I> +We have software in 4 different flavors: +1. free software (FOSS), most of them distributed under any of the GPL versions +2. non-free software, meaning they can not distributed under such +licenses as the GPL. Mostly it's closed source software (like firmware +for devices like graphic cards or some wifi chips) +3. tainted software, this is cost-free but patented software. In +countries which obey software patents (like USA) it is not allowed to +be distributed. +4. then there is software which is non-free AND tainted. + +Of course this special point #4 is a bit bureaucratic. As "tainted" +(aka patented) is the stronger restriction than non-free we should +also place faac into "tainted" as it matches the sentence from the +MGA1 notes anyway (as quoted in Christian's mail). + +In any way I agree that this more or less academical dispute about +faac should not make it impossible to make faac available. + +-- +wobo +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019121.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019123.html">[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#19122">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#19122">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#19122">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#19122">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |