diff options
| author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
| commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
| tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016708.html | |
| parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
| download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip | |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016708.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016708.html | 132 |
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016708.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016708.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..948ba0a4b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016708.html @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%20like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C72d057f73eca032c58522964ef59b36d.squirrel%40mail.rmail.be%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016706.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016710.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media</H1> + <B>AL13N</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%20like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C72d057f73eca032c58522964ef59b36d.squirrel%40mail.rmail.be%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media">alien at rmail.be + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Jun 21 17:27:05 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016706.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016710.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16708">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16708">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16708">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16708">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>><i> On 21 June 2012 14:28, AL13N <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">alien at rmail.be</A>> wrote: +</I>>>><i> Well, AFAIK there is still no stance on backports policy (are we +</I>>>><i> backporting from cauldron +</I>>>><i> (n) to n-2 or not - if we do, we break upgradability here!). +</I>>>><i> Cherry-picking backports is +</I>>>><i> needed. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> This is true, but has to be solved anyway, no bearing on this problem. +</I>>><i> and +</I>>><i> cherry-picking should not be needed(since it's not supported), so that's +</I>>><i> a +</I>>><i> different problem. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> You claim that it's not supported. +</I>><i> But cherry picking one backport is usually what people do. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Denying the reality won't help you make progress... +</I> +well, this time we agreed to have supported backports. + +it is true that almost all devs are cherry-picking backports, but are real +users going to do that? i doubt it, but we don't have any data about this +in any case. + +the reality is that if you want supported backports, there's literally no +way of testing if all combinations of cherrypicking will work or not. +thus, there is no other way solution than to support only having backports +or not. + +but even if you're cherry picking backports, it's still not a problem. you +have the knowhow to cherry pick and thus also to select which ones you +want as dependencies for updates. + +if everyone is cherry picking backports, there's no use to having +supported backports, and thus we should just have unsupported backports. +it'll make all of this alot easier. + + +nonetheless, this isn't only about backports, but also for testing and 3rd +party repos or custom repositories. + +in the end, the best i can come up with is to trust all enabled +repositories. Since the user obviously trusts them. +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016706.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016710.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16708">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16708">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16708">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16708">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |