diff options
author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016700.html | |
parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016700.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016700.html | 131 |
1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016700.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016700.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9483f12d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016700.html @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%20like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C7f16133a9e6245ef41683fbf1e6d1784.squirrel%40mail.rmail.be%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016697.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016706.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media</H1> + <B>AL13N</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%20like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C7f16133a9e6245ef41683fbf1e6d1784.squirrel%40mail.rmail.be%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media">alien at rmail.be + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Jun 21 14:28:40 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016697.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016706.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16700">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16700">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16700">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16700">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>><i> 21.06.2012 14:30, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas: +</I>[...] +><i> Well, AFAIK there is still no stance on backports policy (are we +</I>><i> backporting from cauldron +</I>><i> (n) to n-2 or not - if we do, we break upgradability here!). +</I>><i> Cherry-picking backports is +</I>><i> needed. +</I> +This is true, but has to be solved anyway, no bearing on this problem. and +cherry-picking should not be needed(since it's not supported), so that's a +different problem. + +><i> And i don't think that the packager who is creating update should +</I>><i> check all possible backports. +</I> +no, since cherrypicking is not supported, only needs to be test with +backports and without. + +><i> What if that backport comes into play later? When the update is +</I>><i> already released? +</I> +then the backport packager needs to make sure his backport works, and +since he's part of QA (according to policy), he'll need to test with and +without backports. + +><i> I still think that backports should not be used during updates. +</I> +you're free to think so, but with your skills, i'm sure you can make that +easily happen, like keeping backports disabled, unless you need something. + +><i> And it doesn't make QA work any easier here. +</I>[...] + +actually, i think it is easier for QA, because cherry-picking cannot be +supported, and the backport packager is responsible for his backport +testing. for updates, only needs to be tested with or without backports. +so, since they need 2 tests anyway (i586 and x86_64), if one of them is +with backports enabled and the other is without, it doesn't need any more +testing than before. + + +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016697.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016706.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16700">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16700">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16700">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16700">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |