summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html167
1 files changed, 167 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d7e452d38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016434.html
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20QA%20process%20for%20GNOME%203.4.2%20for%20Mageia%202&In-Reply-To=%3C4FD72A6F.1040400%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016433.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016551.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2</H1>
+ <B>Claire Robinson</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20QA%20process%20for%20GNOME%203.4.2%20for%20Mageia%202&In-Reply-To=%3C4FD72A6F.1040400%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2">eeeemail at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Jun 12 13:39:27 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016433.html">[Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016551.html">[Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#16434">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#16434">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#16434">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#16434">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 12/06/12 12:19, andre999 wrote:
+&gt;<i> Olav Vitters a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> For Mageia 2, I'd like to:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - get my act together and fix a bunch of bugs (a lot of wrong
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> suggests/requires, resulting in bugs&amp;crashers)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - provide GNOME 3.4.2 as update
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> But this concerns loads and loads of packages.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> How to best proceed?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I saw mentioning that QA is really busy. How can I make this as simple
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> as possible for QA (not for myself)?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Should I:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> #1 :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - first fix the various bugs
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - provide each bug as update
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> then later:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - one massive GNOME 3.4.2 update?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> #2 :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - do everything in one go (combine 3.4.2 update with the bugfixes)?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> #3 :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - try and split out all the changes as much as possible (e.g.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> evolution would need new evolution-data-server, so must be updated
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> at the same time).. but ideally go for filing a bug per
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> update/package?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> QA will probably have their answer, but it seems to me much easier for
+</I>&gt;<i> QA to verify one or two packages at a time, meaning #3 as much as
+</I>&gt;<i> possible, and then #1.
+</I>&gt;<i> As far as how you do it for testing yourself (before presenting to QA),
+</I>&gt;<i> you could use whatever approach seems easiest, but even there I would
+</I>&gt;<i> think that #3 as much as possible would be easier. Anyway, that is how I
+</I>&gt;<i> tend to approach things.
+</I>&gt;<i> (#2 seems a potential nightmare, since you're bound to miss things.)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Regarding the wrong requires/suggests these are probably best dealt with
+on separate bugs. They will receive proper attention that way and any
+affected by bug 2317 can hopefully be found so we don't have broken
+updates. That would be more difficult in one large update.
+
+Other bugfixes and the big update I would say to follow KDE's example
+and list what has been fixed with bug numbers, packages being updated,
+srpm's. If the advisory is detailed it makes performing QA alot easier.
+
+That is my first thought anyway. We're organising a QA meeting later
+this week, you're welcome to attend and ask the team. The time/date
+hasn't been finalised yet.
+
+<A HREF="http://framadate.org/kg48uzoef3p9hitx">http://framadate.org/kg48uzoef3p9hitx</A>
+
+Claire
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016433.html">[Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016551.html">[Mageia-dev] QA process for GNOME 3.4.2 for Mageia 2
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#16434">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#16434">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#16434">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#16434">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>