summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html141
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bdc9a72c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016316.html
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4FD3085A.7050003%40eesti.ee%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016311.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016319.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1>
+ <B>Sander Lepik</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4FD3085A.7050003%40eesti.ee%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">sander.lepik at eesti.ee
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Jun 9 10:24:58 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016311.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016319.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#16316">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#16316">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#16316">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#16316">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>08.06.2012 11:38, Samuel Verschelde kirjutas:
+&gt;<i> I re-read the backports policy, and there's a part I think needs to be pointed
+</I>&gt;<i> out before people start to backport packages.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;We need to ensure that upgrades never fail: cauldron must always have a
+</I>&gt;<i> higher version/release than in stable releases.&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This statement is true, but implies more than what it says. It means that we
+</I>&gt;<i> can't backport a package for Mageia 1 with a higher version than what we have
+</I>&gt;<i> in Mageia 2 release (and updates?) media. And this, until we are able to take
+</I>&gt;<i> backports into account during upgrades.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Example :
+</I>&gt;<i> - Mageia 2 has wesnoth 1.10.2 in core/release
+</I>&gt;<i> - Mageia 1 can't get a higher version in its backports media
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Do you all agree with my understanding of the policy ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This is a serious limitation to our ability to backport to Mageia (n-1) and
+</I>&gt;<i> even to our ability to provide security fixes to backports there (will not
+</I>&gt;<i> prevent it, but will prevent to do it by a version upgrade, which is the
+</I>&gt;<i> common way to fix that kind of issue in backports).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Maybe we shouldn't open backports for Mageia 1, and make sure upgrade to
+</I>&gt;<i> Mageia 3 can take backports from Mageia 2 into account so that backports to
+</I>&gt;<i> Mageia 2 are not stopped when Mageia 3 is released. Then we'll be safe.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Samuel
+</I>I reread the backports policy and there are two lines that make backporting from cauldron to
+mga1 impossible:
+* Backports can be cherry-picked (ie, enable backports, install, disable backports).
+* We need to ensure that upgrades never fail
+
+In this regard we can support backports only with new version that is lower than the one on
+next release. If we want to enable backports for mga1 we can backport only from mga2. Not
+from cauldron. This way we can submit updates by submitting new backport into mga1 backports
+repo (users would still have to update manually AFAIK).
+
+Any objections?
+
+--
+Sander
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016311.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016319.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#16316">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#16316">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#16316">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#16316">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>