summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html132
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..313c0a588
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011283.html
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3C4F0ED649.2020905%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011271.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011234.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3C4F0ED649.2020905%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1">andre999mga at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Jan 12 13:47:05 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011271.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011234.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11283">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11283">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11283">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11283">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Buchan Milne a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On Wednesday, 11 January 2012 22:10:01 Juan Luis Baptiste wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Michael Scherer&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 &#224; 11:24 -0500, Juan Luis Baptiste a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> So trusting and having bugs are totally unrelated. And if you doubt that
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> bugs appear, just see our bugzilla.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> We trust upstream ( most of them ), and yet there is bugs.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> No, they're not totally unrelated when we don't have the man power to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> do through QA on every package, we need to trust on the packager (and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> upstream of course) that he did his best to test the new version
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> without expecting him to have tested all the new features, Or do you
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> expect that a QA member get a list of all the new features of a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backport and start testing them one by one ? that's what I call
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> unrealistic in practice.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> If you think that all version backports should be tested in the same
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> way as updates by QA, then all versions upgrades in cauldron should be
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> tested by QA before pushing them to the BS right ?
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> No, they should be tested before being put in the stable release. And
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> that's exactly what we do by freezing and testing before release.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Of course but again, we can't test *all* the new features of *all* the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> programs that are going to a new release, we do our best for most of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> them. Critical components like installer, kernel, drak* tools, etc
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> need more testing and that's where (our very small team) QA should
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> spend their time after a freeze. The rest we have to do our best to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> test after each version update of a package.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And this is IMHO why we should not necessarily enforce full QA on backports.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It is ridiculous to enforce more testing on a package in backports, than most
+</I>&gt;<i> likely was done for it while in cauldron before a release, especially
+</I>&gt;<i> considering the user has a relatively easy mechanism for reverting to the
+</I>&gt;<i> working package.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If QA can state definitively that every package in a release is fully tested,
+</I>&gt;<i> then I might agree.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But, some of the reason to *have* backports is to allow users on stable
+</I>&gt;<i> releases to test new versions that exist in cauldron.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Regards,
+</I>&gt;<i> Buchan
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>+1
+If I remember correctly, our early discussions on backports proposed
+that most of the responsibility for testing would be by those requesting
+the backport in question, and the developer and/or maintainer. So that
+QA would give priority to regular updates.
+And that backports may have somewhat less testing, although we would try
+to give the same level of testing as regular updates.
+The requirement to have them first in cauldron was at least partly
+related to increasing the quality of backports.
+I agree that it is important to enable backports, to help ensure a
+higher quality than will likely result with too much use of 3rd-party repos.
+
+Regards
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011271.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011234.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11283">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11283">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11283">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11283">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>