summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html124
1 files changed, 124 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4e981ac8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010891.html
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Opening%20Backports%20%28once%20again...%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201201031127.12908.bgmilne%40zarb.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010889.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="010894.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)</H1>
+ <B>Buchan Milne</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20Opening%20Backports%20%28once%20again...%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201201031127.12908.bgmilne%40zarb.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)">bgmilne at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Jan 3 10:27:12 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010889.html">[Mageia-dev] Updated ISO's
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010894.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10891">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10891">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10891">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10891">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Sunday, 11 December 2011 19:43:35 Florian Hubold wrote:
+\
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Whatever the decision is, maybe we could tie this to some conditions:
+</I>&gt;<i> Only allow backports if there are near-zero security/critical bugs for the
+</I>&gt;<i> stable release or if there are no open bugs for the package in question?
+</I>
+Well, my first question is, *who* is *responsible* for security updates? This
+is not specified in the updates policy (the role assigned to build the
+security update is named 'Maintainer (or any interested packager)', but who is
+responsible for checking that we have all applicable updates? In Mandriva, it
+was the responsibility of the security team (with cooperation from the
+maintainer in some cases).
+
+At some stage we also need to look at providing vulnerability data in a
+suitable format that supports automated validation (e.g. OVAL?), and a site
+able to browse advisories.
+
+&gt;<i> Just some random crazy idea ...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> IMHO we should focus on security and bugfixes for the stable release,
+</I>&gt;<i> and there are currently too many security bugs open, some for a
+</I>&gt;<i> really long time, where nothing is happening for months, yet we still
+</I>&gt;<i> talk and concern about opening backports.
+</I>
+FYI: the reason I have been slow on updates for Mageia is that I still have
+systems running Mandriva, precisely because the bacports situation has not
+been finalised, and I don't want to submit all missing packages in Mageia 1 to
+updates. Once backports is open, I can drop some Mandriva packages, and spend
+more time contributing to Mageia.
+
+So, you can't necessarily say that backports steals time from updates ...
+
+Regards,
+Buchan
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010889.html">[Mageia-dev] Updated ISO's
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010894.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: Opening Backports (once again...)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10891">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10891">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10891">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10891">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>