summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html138
1 files changed, 138 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2cb4333a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/013906.html
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20How%20to%20proceed%20with%20seamonkey/iceape%20for%0A%09security%20updates%20and%20freeze%20push&In-Reply-To=%3C201204050811.21228.alien%40rmail.be%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="013891.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="013919.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push</H1>
+ <B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20How%20to%20proceed%20with%20seamonkey/iceape%20for%0A%09security%20updates%20and%20freeze%20push&In-Reply-To=%3C201204050811.21228.alien%40rmail.be%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push">alien at rmail.be
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Apr 5 08:11:21 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013891.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013919.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#13906">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#13906">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#13906">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#13906">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Op woensdag 04 april 2012 22:59:30 schreef Florian Hubold:
+&gt;<i> Am 26.03.2012 19:46, schrieb Florian Hubold:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Hi all,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; i've taken a look at iceape and locally updated it to 2.7.2&#185; after
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; talking with maintainer
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; about it, with the intent to at least push this to Mageia 1, because
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; since initial import
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; it has not received any security updates (and there are countless
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; security problem) I've also completed the rebrand to iceape as far as i
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; saw fit (change URL to release
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; notes, applied some more debian rebranding patches, removed updater files
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; and updater menu item, and some more smaller fixes, current svn diff is
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; attached) and did some cleaning of old and unused stuff.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &#185;: I've only updated it to 2.7.2 as 2.8 does require newer NSPR, and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; that's a no-go for Mageia 1, which is my primary target.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; The biggest problem is: current maintainer does not have enough time to
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; maintain it properly, and i'm not planning on doing it either, as i
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; don't use it or know it well.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; There are at least 3 good options on how to proceed, apart from mga1
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; update:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 1.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; push latest version to cauldron, and hope somebody will maintain it
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; afterwards (this is the worst IMHO, as we'll probably face the same
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; situation with a de-facto umaintained package throughout Mageia 2
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; lifetime, which i want to avoid)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 2.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; drop iceape, package as seamonkey again and sync with Fedora
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; (this one would at least make maintenance easier, only need to follow
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Fedora)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 3.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; drop iceape completely
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; (actually this has the advantage that users can have official upstream
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; binaries, and take advantage of automatic updates. Current maintainer
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; agrees with this, as it's simply too fragile for him to maintain it
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; easily.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; If somebody is against this, please step up as maintainer or help the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; current maintainer)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I'm currently in contact with some seamonkey developers, to maybe clear
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; up why/if the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; rebrand is needed, if it's needed like it's currently done, and why
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Fedora can simply
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; ship seamonkey without the need for a rebrand, but the dialog may take
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; some time, this
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; would be only relevant for option 2.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; If nobody responds, i'll push my current work as security update for
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Mageia 1, and drop iceape from cauldron so that we won't have an
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; outdated package and a potential security risk for Mageia 2.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Kind regards
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> As there was no real objection, and no other comments
+</I>&gt;<i> or votes for iceape, i've dropped it from cauldron. FWIW i'm quite
+</I>&gt;<i> unhappy with this. Related, i've also not got any reply yet to my
+</I>&gt;<i> aforementioned inquiry about mozilla branding permissions.
+</I>
+About the mozilla branding...
+
+Perhaps this should be a meeting point for packaging/council meeting...
+
+ie: someone assigned to this point so it's not forgotten.
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013891.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013919.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#13906">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#13906">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#13906">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#13906">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>