summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar.gz
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar.bz2
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar.xz
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html98
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bcb4996b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004935.html
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20slight%20security%20improvement%3A%20should%20we%0A%09update%09aria2%20to%201.11.2%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20110524104513.GH21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="004934.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="004937.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?</H1>
+ <B>nicolas vigier</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20slight%20security%20improvement%3A%20should%20we%0A%09update%09aria2%20to%201.11.2%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20110524104513.GH21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?">boklm at mars-attacks.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue May 24 12:45:13 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004934.html">[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004937.html">[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4935">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4935">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4935">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4935">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Tue, 24 May 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I would keep this as a update after the release is out ( like they 4
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> ruby cve, libzip one ( CVE-2011-0421 )) and others that came out since
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> yesterday.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So maybe we could open bugs for this ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> There is 2 proposal :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - filling them on security, and have a saved search
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> What do you mean by that, a security product?
+</I>
+There is a component &quot;Security&quot; on bugzilla.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - creating a tracker bug
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I would be in favor of the tracker bug :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - you can subscribe to it
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - it will be clearer ( as bugfixes are not security so we may miss some
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> update to do )
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - it doesn't pollute the list of saved search
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> But as pascal said, a tracker bug requires that each bug to be linked to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> it, which is manual and error prone.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I don't know much about bugzilla, but:
+</I>&gt;<i> - Add a keyword 'security' to all security bugs.
+</I>&gt;<i> (also manual and error prone?)
+</I>
+We already have a security component. Would a keyword instead of a
+component be better for this ?
+
+It is also manual, but a keywork is easier to remember than a tracker
+bug number.
+
+Maybe we can also think about a mailing list to receive all security
+bugs.
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004934.html">[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004937.html">[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4935">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4935">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4935">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4935">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>