summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html173
1 files changed, 173 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..84168fed0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110113/002104.html
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20Mageia%3A%20implement%20bitorrent%09protocol%0A%20to%20allow%20updates%20download&In-Reply-To=%3C4D2E559D.6040808%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002125.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002107.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20Mageia%3A%20implement%20bitorrent%09protocol%0A%20to%20allow%20updates%20download&In-Reply-To=%3C4D2E559D.6040808%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Jan 13 02:30:05 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002125.html">[Mageia-dev] Java-Policy first draft published
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002107.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2104">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2104">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2104">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2104">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Olivier Thauvin a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> * andre999 (<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">andr55 at laposte.net</A>) wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Romain d'Alverny a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 04:29, Michael Scherer&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> However, if 1) was to open 5 connections on 5 distinct servers, that
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> would make more sense, no?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Right.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Another way to look at the question :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> If 1000 people are downloading from mirrors allowing a total of 2000
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> connexions, if no-one uses multiple connexions, then 1000 connexions are
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> wasted. These unused connexions would likely be from faster mirrors.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The upload given by a serveur is split in term of:
+</I>&gt;<i> - connection available
+</I>&gt;<i> - bandwidth available.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If the mirrors is connected to Gb (which is more likelly the size of
+</I>&gt;<i> bandwidth for the whole university...), and you split this Gb/s onto
+</I>&gt;<i> 2000 connection you obtain 500kb/s.
+</I>
+Please note that my example was hypothetical, for multiple sites :)
+Sorry if that wasn't clear. I don't know of _any_ single sites able to
+do that. (Although I don't doubt that they exist.)
+(When I started the example, I wrote 20 mirrors, but then erased it
+because it didn't seem relevant to my point.)
+
+&gt;<i> However, I know only few server in the world really able to read Gb/s
+</I>&gt;<i> from their disk. The top rate I obtain on dc is 400mbis/s (the memory
+</I>&gt;<i> cache help a lot to obtain more).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The number of connection is set high because some people download at
+</I>&gt;<i> only 50kb/s and other 2Mbit/s, so the spare bandwidth from the 50kb/s
+</I>&gt;<i> can be given to others. Nothing more.
+</I>
+exactly
+
+&gt;<i> According the graph on distrib-coffee:
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/munin/distrib-coffee/distrib-coffee/index.html">http://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/munin/distrib-coffee/distrib-coffee/index.html</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> there is an average of 100 http download at a time, if each connection
+</I>&gt;<i> become 5 (500), you'll reach the limit (200 on this server).
+</I>&gt;<i> What will be the gain on your side ?
+</I>
+In that context, obviously. The idea wasn't that most sites would have
+5 connexions - rather to allow up to 5 (depending on the traffic at the
+moment. I would expect most sites to have one or 2 connexions. And
+preferably use multiple mirrors, as recommended by aria2c documentation.
+
+&gt;<i> I talked here only about http, but apply the same to ftp in the same
+</I>&gt;<i> internet connection, so it mean I have 100mbits/s to share between 400
+</I>&gt;<i> connections.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> As Michael explain, I voluntary limit the count of connection per IP,
+</I>&gt;<i> before I did this, the server was overload 12 hour a day, which mean
+</I>&gt;<i> stop serving !
+</I>
+A very good idea. I would do the same thing in your situation.
+Actually, aria2c would work somewhat better if all sites with more
+limited capacity did the same thing. Because the benefit comes from
+making use of the unused capacity (of the moment) of mostly larger
+mirror sites. And trying to access sites already at capacity slows
+somewhat the downloading.
+Unfortunately not all download software monitors the connexion speed to
+dynamically choose the fastest connexions, as does aria2c.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> With aria2c, 3 mirrors which support a total of 5 connexions gives me
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> optimal speed. (The limit being the speed of my computer.)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Can we know the speed of your connection ?
+</I>
+Fast, but I don't know exactly. It is at the local library, via wi-fi.
+ (I use it for downloading ISOs because my home connexion has limited
+bandwidth.)
+It is on the municipal network with telephony and all, and I access it
+in the evening, when essentially only the library is open. I have seen
+another user downloading at over 900 KB/sec while I was downloading, at
+a somewhat slower speed. (A while back.)
+
+At the library with up to 5 connexions on 2 or 3 mirrors, it is always
+over 600 KB/sec, often over 700 KB/sec. The last time I did a
+comparison (1 connexion/1 mirror vs max 5 connexions/2 mirrors) for a
+DVD, the ratio of speed was approx 3,5. (From summary notes on my
+computer.)
+
+&gt;<i> Maybe your connection is good enough to provide a mirror for Mageia ?
+</I>&gt;<i> And then you'll be able to test what you're suggesting.
+</I>
+Unfortunately, my home connexion tops out at 400KB/sec (officially
+512KB/sec), but usually is less than half that. (Variable-speed slow
+DSL.) And the upload speed is severely limited by my FAI, as well as a
+limited bandwidth.
+Wouldn't mind trying a mirror when better connexions become available.
+(Don't know if I would go for something as big as Mageia, though.)
+
+&gt;<i> What is the result with 5 mirrors and 1 connection per mirror ?
+</I>At the library, it tops out with 3 mirrors and 5 connexions. The best
+was over 700KB/sec. (4 mirrors wasn't any faster.)
+(I borrowed a faster computer from someone once, and it averaged well
+over 800 KB/sec on 1 mirror/5 connexions, for download of a DVD.)
+
+&gt;<i> Obviously, any mirror in France (I am in France) is able to fulfill
+</I>&gt;<i> my personnal connection... (10mbits/s).
+</I>
+J'aimerais bien &#231;a :)
+Where I live (banlieue de Montr&#233;al), I couldn't get more than 2Mbits/s
+(officially), if that. And fairly expensive, as well. With very
+limited upload speeds.
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002125.html">[Mageia-dev] Java-Policy first draft published
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002107.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2104">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2104">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2104">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2104">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>