diff options
| author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
| commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
| tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008513.html | |
| parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
| download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip | |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008513.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008513.html | 108 |
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008513.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008513.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d20e4845d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008513.html @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20110929195459.GF11752%40bkor.dhs.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008510.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008514.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?</H1> + <B>Olav Vitters</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20110929195459.GF11752%40bkor.dhs.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?">olav at vitters.nl + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Sep 29 21:54:59 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008510.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008514.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8513">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8513">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8513">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8513">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:38:18PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: +><i> Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:22: +</I>><i> >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: +</I>><i> >>And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip... +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> >Guarantee, no, but the combined total number of days delayed over the +</I>><i> >last 5 years or so is probably 1 day. The release cycle is *very* +</I>><i> >stable. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> +</I>><i> But as you stated its only a "likely" schedule so far, +</I>><i> and the <A HREF="https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree">https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree</A> also states +</I>><i> +</I>><i> "! Attention: This schedule is still a draft to discuss." +</I> +My question is for the current intended release date of GNOME 3.4. If +that date is moved, of course the decision will need to be taken again. +I don't really expect any changes to the date though. And if it changes, +of course I'll say so here. My intention is to ensure Mageia has the +latest, but not at all costs. + +The schedule will be made final within 3 weeks or so btw. Early enough +to revisit a Mageia 2 decision if the date is moved back. + +><i> so I'm not conviced so far, and it also means noe even our final RC +</I>><i> would have final gnome packages available, wich means a lot of +</I>><i> beta/rc testing wont be done on it... meaning not really a "quality +</I>><i> release" +</I>><i> for Mageia 2. +</I> +Process is the same? Test the betas of GNOME 3.4, file bugs, get them +fixed and then get new tarballs? + +The last stable release of GNOME 3.2 is November 23, after that date, +any bug that Mageia finds in 3.2 will not go into anything other than +3.4. So you can do loads of GNOME 3.2 testing, but it only causes a lot +of extra work trying to get the 3.4 stuff into 3.2? + +I'm really new to the distribution POV (though've lurked for *many* +years), so welcome any further insight. +-- +Regards, +Olav +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008510.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008514.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8513">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8513">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8513">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8513">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |