summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar.gz
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar.bz2
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.tar.xz
archives-1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html123
1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6d3d01965
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006734.html
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20new%20mgarepo%20version&In-Reply-To=%3C1310814824.3728.321.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006722.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006740.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20new%20mgarepo%20version&In-Reply-To=%3C1310814824.3728.321.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Jul 16 13:13:42 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006722.html">[Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006740.html">[Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6734">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6734">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6734">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6734">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 &#224; 12:34 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 12:20:22, Michael Scherer a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I am not keen on pushing our newer tool on update, since we plan to have
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; our server using mageia, and so in the futur, if we push newer iurt,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; mgarepo, rpmlint, they may potentially disrupt build system. So by being
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; clear and using backports, we would avoid such problem more easily.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Except if you plan to use those newer version on the build system, in which
+</I>&gt;<i> case sending to updates_testing to have them well tested then pushed to
+</I>&gt;<i> updates would avoid having to install backports on the BS ?
+</I>
+We already have backports on the BS, and we will likely not be able to
+avoid it. For example, transifex, while not being part of the BS per
+se, is backported from cooker/cauldron. And it is planned to upgrade it
+to next stable release, as asked by i18n team. There is no way that a
+new tx would be pushed as update, that's too disruptive.
+
+Moreover, I do not exclude the case that someone would deploy the same
+build system as us ( let's say a company that provides custom version of
+Mageia, a university that deploy custom build of software, whatever ),
+and would prefer to not follow our upgrade path.
+
+So I think the build system stuff should not have a exception for
+updates.
+
+Now, the problem arise also because mgarepo is used on both client side,
+and server side.
+
+On client side, it could likely fall as &quot;needed to follow API changes&quot;,
+at least for this version ( like would tx-client, or wesnoth ), even if
+the problem is also the lack of web interface ( as this would avoid
+requiring a new command line client ).
+
+But on server side, the update reason doesn't apply.
+
+So having a separate binary ( and/or tarball, while on it ) for the
+server part, and make sure this one do not change much would be cleaner,
+IMHO.
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006722.html">[Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006740.html">[Mageia-dev] new mgarepo version
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6734">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6734">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6734">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6734">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>