summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html126
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..03fe5e770
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101129222020.GK21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001522.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001510.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
+ <B>nicolas vigier</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101129222020.GK21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">boklm at mars-attacks.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Nov 29 23:20:20 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001522.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001510.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1525">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1525">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1525">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1525">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, andre999 wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> They focus on the issue in question, to varying degrees of success.
+</I>&gt;<i> (Reminds me of end-user support. Much of the time they don't recognize the
+</I>&gt;<i> real problem.)
+</I>&gt;<i> My point is, significant bugs in core packages should be fixed in a timely
+</I>&gt;<i> manner, as much as possible. And indeed, critical bugs should be fixed.
+</I>&gt;<i> But if a critical bug affects a non-core package, it is likely to affect
+</I>&gt;<i> only that package. Not so a core bug.
+</I>
+I would expect package maintainers to know wether the packages they
+maintain are critical or not by themself. I don't think it would make
+sense to look at the repository name to decide if it's a critical bug or
+not.
+
+&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Core is proposed to be largely &quot;base system&amp; components&quot;. Part of the
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> idea is to make clearer, to everyone, which packages have an enhanced level
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> of support.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Support time is another (useful) question.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Why do we need two repositories for that ?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Sandbox.
+</I>&gt;<i> It is clearer to everyone.
+</I>
+How is that &quot;clearer&quot; ? The level of support is not even displayed in
+current versions of rpmdrake. And you have to click on &quot;Details&quot; to see
+the repository name.
+If we provide the list of fully supported packages separatly, we could
+display the level of support in the package manager. How would that be
+&quot;less clear to everyone&quot; ?
+
+&gt;<i> The fact that Mandriva didn't control what went into main is a large part
+</I>&gt;<i> of their problem.
+</I>
+Mandriva controled what went into main.
+
+&gt;<i> If you can find another solution, just as reliable, great.
+</I>&gt;<i> But I suspect it would be more complex, and probably cost more in resources
+</I>&gt;<i> as well.
+</I>&gt;<i> The cost of extra repositories is almost nil - if we assume that we want to
+</I>&gt;<i> rigorously control what is to be fully supported, and apply it.
+</I>
+As already explained in this thread, the cost is not nil, and we don't
+need repositories to define what is fully supported.
+
+&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - Some packages have a lot of optional plugins, and we build them all,
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> adding a lot of build requires. With main/contrib separation we need
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> to add all the build dependencies to main, even if most of them are
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> not runtime dependencies.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> We will have to be more selective for core packages, to avoid this problem.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Maybe &quot;suggests&quot;, or other features being added with rpm5.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Suggests on BuildRequires does not exists. And we need them to be
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> installed for the build.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If a core package has real buildrequires, then these requires should be in
+</I>&gt;<i> core.
+</I>
+What is &quot;real buildrequires&quot; ?
+
+&gt;<i> If only a non-core package has buildrequires, these requires need not
+</I>&gt;<i> necessarily be in core.
+</I>&gt;<i> Although packages like cmake should probably be in core anyway, as they are
+</I>&gt;<i> very likely to be used to build packages.
+</I>&gt;<i> I don't know details for rpm5, but it could have the equivalent of suggests
+</I>&gt;<i> for buildrequires. (Like an alternate list of tools required ?)
+</I>
+Suggests for buildrequires doesn't make much sense.
+
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001522.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001510.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1525">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1525">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1525">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1525">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>