diff options
author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html | |
parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html | 126 |
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..03fe5e770 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101129/001525.html @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101129222020.GK21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001522.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001510.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1> + <B>nicolas vigier</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101129222020.GK21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">boklm at mars-attacks.org + </A><BR> + <I>Mon Nov 29 23:20:20 CET 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001522.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001510.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1525">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1525">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1525">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1525">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, andre999 wrote: + +><i> They focus on the issue in question, to varying degrees of success. +</I>><i> (Reminds me of end-user support. Much of the time they don't recognize the +</I>><i> real problem.) +</I>><i> My point is, significant bugs in core packages should be fixed in a timely +</I>><i> manner, as much as possible. And indeed, critical bugs should be fixed. +</I>><i> But if a critical bug affects a non-core package, it is likely to affect +</I>><i> only that package. Not so a core bug. +</I> +I would expect package maintainers to know wether the packages they +maintain are critical or not by themself. I don't think it would make +sense to look at the repository name to decide if it's a critical bug or +not. + +>>><i> Core is proposed to be largely "base system& components". Part of the +</I>>>><i> idea is to make clearer, to everyone, which packages have an enhanced level +</I>>>><i> of support. +</I>>>><i> Support time is another (useful) question. +</I>>>><i> +</I>>><i> Why do we need two repositories for that ? +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> Sandbox. +</I>><i> It is clearer to everyone. +</I> +How is that "clearer" ? The level of support is not even displayed in +current versions of rpmdrake. And you have to click on "Details" to see +the repository name. +If we provide the list of fully supported packages separatly, we could +display the level of support in the package manager. How would that be +"less clear to everyone" ? + +><i> The fact that Mandriva didn't control what went into main is a large part +</I>><i> of their problem. +</I> +Mandriva controled what went into main. + +><i> If you can find another solution, just as reliable, great. +</I>><i> But I suspect it would be more complex, and probably cost more in resources +</I>><i> as well. +</I>><i> The cost of extra repositories is almost nil - if we assume that we want to +</I>><i> rigorously control what is to be fully supported, and apply it. +</I> +As already explained in this thread, the cost is not nil, and we don't +need repositories to define what is fully supported. + +>>>><i> - Some packages have a lot of optional plugins, and we build them all, +</I>>>>><i> adding a lot of build requires. With main/contrib separation we need +</I>>>>><i> to add all the build dependencies to main, even if most of them are +</I>>>>><i> not runtime dependencies. +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>><i> We will have to be more selective for core packages, to avoid this problem. +</I>>>><i> Maybe "suggests", or other features being added with rpm5. +</I>>>><i> +</I>>><i> Suggests on BuildRequires does not exists. And we need them to be +</I>>><i> installed for the build. +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> If a core package has real buildrequires, then these requires should be in +</I>><i> core. +</I> +What is "real buildrequires" ? + +><i> If only a non-core package has buildrequires, these requires need not +</I>><i> necessarily be in core. +</I>><i> Although packages like cmake should probably be in core anyway, as they are +</I>><i> very likely to be used to build packages. +</I>><i> I don't know details for rpm5, but it could have the equivalent of suggests +</I>><i> for buildrequires. (Like an alternate list of tools required ?) +</I> +Suggests for buildrequires doesn't make much sense. + +</PRE> + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001522.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001510.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1525">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1525">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1525">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1525">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |